Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/91104
Registo completo
Campo DC | Valor | Idioma |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Capinha, Marta | por |
dc.contributor.author | Rijo, Daniel | por |
dc.contributor.author | Matos, Marlene | por |
dc.contributor.author | Pereira, Marco | por |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-04-18T15:49:38Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-04-18T15:49:38Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2023 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Capinha, M., Rijo, D., Matos, M., & Pereira, M. (2023). Interpartner Agreement on Intimate Partner Violence Reports: Evidence From a Community Sample of Different-Sex Couples. Assessment, 0(0). https://doi.org/10.1177/10731911231196483 | por |
dc.identifier.issn | 1073-1911 | por |
dc.identifier.uri | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/91104 | - |
dc.description | First published online September 21, 2023 | por |
dc.description.abstract | An accurate assessment of intimate partner violence (IPV) is crucial to guide public policy and intervention. The Conflict Tactic Scales Revised (CTS-2) is one of the most widely used instruments to do so. Despite its good psychometric properties, research on interpartner agreement has pointed to low-to-moderate estimates, which generated some concerns about the validity of the results obtained through single-partner reports. This cross-sectional study introduces indexes that have not previously been used to assess interpartner agreement. Both partners’ reports on perpetration and victimization were analyzed in a community sample of 268 different-sex couples. Our results generally pointed to better agreement levels on IPV occurrence than frequency, suggesting that the proxy method (i.e., using a single-partner report) could be a reliable method for assessing IPV occurrence but not its frequency in this population. Findings are discussed as well as the advantages and constraints of different IPV assessment practices. | por |
dc.description.sponsorship | FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia(SFRH/BD/137335/2018) | por |
dc.language.iso | eng | por |
dc.publisher | SAGE Publications | por |
dc.relation | info:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/POR_CENTRO/SFRH%2FBD%2F137335%2F2018/PT | por |
dc.rights | openAccess | por |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | por |
dc.subject | Gwet’s AC1 | por |
dc.subject | Inter-rater reliability | por |
dc.subject | Interpartner agreement | por |
dc.subject | Intimate partner violence | por |
dc.subject | Intra class correlation | por |
dc.subject | Proxy method | por |
dc.subject | Revised Conflict Tactic Scales | por |
dc.title | Interpartner agreement on intimate partner violence reports: evidence from a community sample of different-sex couples | por |
dc.type | article | - |
dc.peerreviewed | yes | por |
dc.relation.publisherversion | https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10731911231196483 | por |
oaire.citationStartPage | 1 | por |
oaire.citationEndPage | 14 | por |
dc.date.updated | 2024-04-18T13:51:08Z | - |
dc.identifier.eissn | 1552-3489 | por |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1177/10731911231196483 | por |
sdum.export.identifier | 16132 | - |
sdum.journal | Assessment | por |
Aparece nas coleções: | CIPsi - Artigos (Papers) |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1.1.2 Interpartner Agreement on Intimate Partner Violence Reports-Evidence .pdf | 304,89 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons