Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/66759

TítuloWhen we must forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors
Autor(es)Matos, Patricia
Santos, Flavia H.
Albuquerque, Pedro Barbas
Palavras-chaveProspective memory
unfulfilled intentions
commission errors
ongoing task load
Data2020
EditoraTaylor & Francis Ltd
RevistaMemory
CitaçãoPatrícia Matos, Flávia H. Santos & Pedro B. Albuquerque (2020): When wemust forget: the effect of cognitive load on prospective memory commission errors, Memory. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09658211.2020.1726399
Resumo(s)Recent studies consistently show that prospective memory (PM) intentions are not always deactivated when no-longer needed and might be erroneously performed upon encountering the once relevant cue - termed PM commission errors. However, empirical evidence on the potential mechanisms that might lead to this kind of memory failure remains mostly unexplored. This study aimed to investigate the influence of the ongoing task demands on PM deactivation of non-performed intentions. Younger adults, except for those in the no-PM condition, were asked to perform a PM task and were then told that the intention was finished. Later, they perform a lexical decision task with some trials containing (irrelevant) PM cues while simultaneously carrying out a counting recall task with two levels of difficulty. The results showed a higher risk of PM commission errors under moderate cognitive load (74%) as compared to the no-load condition (40%). Results also show that commission error risk did not increase in the high-load (54%) compared with the moderate-load condition. Furthermore, comparisons of the ongoign task performance between the no-PM condition and the other conditions with a PM task requirement support that commission errors might arise from a spontaneous PM retrieval. The implications of these findings are discussed within the dual-mechanisms account.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/66759
DOI10.1080/09658211.2020.1726399
ISSN0965-8211
Versão da editorahttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09658211.2020.1726399
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:CIPsi - Artigos (Papers)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2020 MATOS, SANTOS & ALBUQUERQUE (2020) - MEMORY .pdf
Acesso restrito!
1,55 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID