Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/7893

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorUtagawa, Maria Lúcia-
dc.contributor.authorShirata, Neuza Kasumi-
dc.contributor.authorFerraz, Maria da Gloria Mattosinho de Castro-
dc.contributor.authorLoreto, Celso di-
dc.contributor.authorDall’ Agnol, Miria-
dc.contributor.authorLongatto Filho, Adhemar-
dc.date.accessioned2008-06-02T21:51:50Z-
dc.date.available2008-
dc.date.issued2008-
dc.date.submitted2007-02-01-
dc.identifier.issn0001-5547por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/7893-
dc.descriptionProva tipográfica (In Press)-
dc.description.abstractObjectiveTo evaluate performance and viability of internal quality control QC) strategies in a public health laboratory of the state of Sao Paulo.Study DesignA retrospective study was per formed with 3 QC strategies to improve internal cytologic diagnoses: morphologic guided-list criteria (MGLC), 100% rapid-rescreening (100% RR) of negative slides ("turret" method) and 10% rescreening (10% R) of negative slides. Cases were examined at Adolfo Lutz Institute, Sao Paulo, Brazil, from 2002 to 2004. Histopathologic results, when available, were considered gold standard; cytologic consensus diagnosis was by 2 pathologists when histologic results were unavailable.ResultsMGLC selected 20.7% samples with cytologic atypias, 10% R selected 0.6% and RR selected 2.5%. Cytologic/histologic initial concordance was 57.4%, low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion false negative rate was 34.9% and high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion false negative rate was 12.2%. After diagnosis, consensus concordance was 97.2%.ConclusionThe 100% RR and 10% R QC strategies detected more false negative cases in liquid-based cytology than in conventional Pap smears. The 100% RR strategy reduced the false negative results and allowed evaluation of individual staff performance. The 10% R strategy did not offer significant results. We concluded that association of MGLC and 100% RR strategies might improve cytologic diagnostic quality.por
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherKarger Publisherspor
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectCytologic techniqueeng
dc.subjectPapanicolaou smeareng
dc.subjectQuality controleng
dc.titlePerformance of 3 methods for quality control for gynecologic cytology diagnoseseng
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
sdum.publicationstatusin publicationeng
oaire.citationStartPage439por
oaire.citationEndPage444por
oaire.citationIssue4por
oaire.citationVolume52por
dc.identifier.doi10.1159/000325549por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalActa Cytologicapor
Appears in Collections:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
AC-03414-07_PTA2.pdf487,66 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID