Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/67451
Título: | Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference |
Autor(es): | Norcini, John Anderson, Brownell Bollela, Valdes Burch, Vanessa Costa, Manuel João Duvivier, Robbert Galbraith, Robert Hays, Richard Kent, Athol Perrott, Vanessa Roberts, Trudie |
Palavras-chave: | Clinical Competence Consensus Development Conferences as Topic Education, Medical Educational Measurement Humans Learning Patients Teaching |
Data: | 2011 |
Editora: | Taylor & Francis |
Revista: | Medical Teacher |
Citação: | Norcini, J., Anderson, B., Bollela, V., Burch, V., Costa, M. J., Duvivier, R., ... & Roberts, T. (2011). Criteria for good assessment: consensus statement and recommendations from the Ottawa 2010 Conference. Medical teacher, 33(3), 206-214 |
Resumo(s): | In this article, we outline criteria for good assessment that include: (1) validity or coherence, (2) reproducibility or consistency, (3) equivalence, (4) feasibility, (5) educational effect, (6) catalytic effect, and (7) acceptability. Many of the criteria have been described before and we continue to support their importance here. However, we place particular emphasis on the catalytic effect of the assessment, which is whether the assessment provides results and feedback in a fashion that creates, enhances, and supports education. These criteria do not apply equally well to all situations. Consequently, we discuss how the purpose of the test (summative versus formative) and the perspectives of stakeholders (examinees, patients, teachers-educational institutions, healthcare system, and regulators) influence the importance of the criteria. Finally, we offer a series of practice points as well as next steps that should be taken with the criteria. Specifically, we recommend that the criteria be expanded or modified to take account of: (1) the perspectives of patients and the public, (2) the intimate relationship between assessment, feedback, and continued learning, (3) systems of assessment, and (4) accreditation systems. |
Tipo: | Artigo |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/67451 |
DOI: | 10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559 |
ISSN: | 0142-159X |
e-ISSN: | 1466-187X |
Versão da editora: | https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.3109/0142159X.2011.551559 |
Arbitragem científica: | yes |
Acesso: | Acesso restrito autor |
Aparece nas coleções: | ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
norcini2011.pdf Acesso restrito! | 130,73 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |