Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/67405

TítuloBowel preparation for small bowel capsule endoscopy - The later, the better!
Autor(es)Xavier, S.
Rosa, B.
Monteiro, S.
Arieira, C.
Magalhães, R.
Cúrdia Gonçalves, T.
Boal Carvalho, P.
Magalhães, J.
Moreira, M. J.
Cotter, José Almeida Berkeley
Palavras-chaveAdult
Aged
Capsule Endoscopy
Cathartics
Female
Gastrointestinal Transit
Humans
Intestine, Small
Male
Middle Aged
Pilot Projects
Polyethylene Glycols
Prospective Studies
Fasting
Bowel preparation
Diagnostic yield
Small bowel capsule endoscopy
DataOut-2019
EditoraElsevier 1
RevistaDigestive and Liver Disease
CitaçãoXavier, S., Rosa, B., Monteiro, S., Arieira, C., Magalhães, R., et. al. (2019). Bowel preparation for small bowel capsule endoscopy–The later, the better!. Digestive and Liver Disease, 51(10), 1388-1391
Resumo(s)In small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), the presence of residue may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Background In small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE), the presence of residue may compromise diagnostic accuracy. Aims To assess differences in quality of visualisation and diagnostic yield of SBCE using 3 different preparation protocols. Methods Prospective, randomized, blind, pilot study. Protocol A:Clear liquids diet the day before the examination with fasting from 8p.m.; Protocol B:Protocol A + 2 pouches of Moviprep®(polyethylene glycol electrolyte solution + sodium ascorbate) in 1 L of water from 8p.m. of the day before the examination; Protocol C: Protocol A + 2 pouches of Moviprep® in 1 L of water consumed after real-time confirmation of capsule arrival at small bowel. Small bowel preparation was classified by two experienced physicians, considering the percentage of the examination during which mucosal observation was adequate: Excellent(>90%); Good(90–75%); Fair(75–50%); Poor(<50%). Results 101 patients randomized to the 3 protocols (A 37, B 31, C 33 patients). Protocol C had an excellent/good small bowel preparation in a higher percentage of examinations for both readers(Reader 1-A:37.8% vs B:45.2% vs C:78.8%, p = 0.002 and Reader 2 –A:37.8% vs B:41.9% vs C:75.8%, p = 0.003). Also, protocol C had a higher detection of angioectasia (A:5.4% vs B:9.7% vs C:27.3%, p = 0.022). Conclusions The administration of Moviprep® after the capsule had reached the small bowel was associated with a better small bowel preparation and a higher detection of angioectasia.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/67405
DOI10.1016/j.dld.2019.04.014
ISSN1590-8658
Versão da editorahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1590865819305547
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Xavier-2019-Bowel-preparation-for-small-bowel-c.pdf
Acesso restrito!
356,8 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID