Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/67206

TítuloCapsule endoscopy: Is the software TOP 100 a reliable tool in suspected small bowel bleeding?
Autor(es)Arieira, Cátia
Monteiro, Sara
Dias de Castro, Francisca
Boal Carvalho, Pedro
Rosa, Bruno
Moreira, Maria João
Cotter, José Almeida Berkeley
Palavras-chaveCapsule Endoscopy
Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Portugal
Reproducibility of Results
Retrospective Studies
Software
Ulcer
Anemia, Iron-Deficiency
Angiodysplasia
Gastrointestinal Hemorrhage
Intestine, Small
Melena
Small bowel capsule endoscopy
Anaemia
Melenas
DataDez-2019
EditoraElsevier 1
RevistaDigestive and Liver Disease
CitaçãoArieira, C., Monteiro, S., de Castro, F. D., Carvalho, P. B., Rosa, B., Moreira, M. J., & Cotter, J. (2019). Capsule endoscopy: Is the software TOP 100 a reliable tool in suspected small bowel bleeding?. Digestive and Liver Disease, 51(12), 1661-1664
Resumo(s)Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the reference standard tool for diagnosing small bowel bleeding (SBB). The "TOP 100", which performs an automatic selection of the 100 images that mostly likely contain abnormalities, emerged as a new functionality of the RAPID Reader® software in 2017. Background Small bowel capsule endoscopy (SBCE) is the reference standard tool for diagnosing small bowel bleeding (SBB). The “TOP 100”, which performs an automatic selection of the 100 images that mostly likely contain abnormalities, emerged as a new functionality of the RAPID Reader® software in 2017. Aim To compare the concordance of findings between the standard reading (SR) and the use of TOP 100 in suspected SBB. Methods Retrospective study, including consecutive patients submitted to SBCE for suspected SBB. Two experienced readers performed SR and reported the most important findings. Another experienced reader, who was blinded to the SR results, reviewed all the SBCE videos using TOP 100 and reported the most important findings. The relevant findings were defined as the presence of high bleeding potential lesions (P2). Results 97 patients were included. The TOP 100 detected 81/97(83.5%) of the P2 lesions, in particular 64/67(95.5%) of the angioectasias and 17/30(56.7%) of the ulcers. The TOP 100 identified all sites of active bleeding (n = 9). Conclusion The TOP 100 identified all sites of active bleeding, as well as the vast majority of significant lesions (83.5%); in particular, it detected over 95% of the angioectasias. Although SR remains the reference standard in the SBCE review, these findings demonstrate that TOP 100 allows for a quick preview reading constituting an important asset in the identification of lesions that may require priority full review and intervention planning
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/67206
DOI10.1016/j.dld.2019.06.008
ISSN1590-8658
Versão da editorahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1590865819306656
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Arieira-2019-Capsule-endoscopy-is-the-software-t.pdf
Acesso restrito!
1,15 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID