Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/58237

TítuloValidation of a novel software tool for automatic aortic annular sizing in three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiographic images
Autor(es)Queirós, Sandro Filipe Monteiro
Morais, Pedro
Dubois, Christophe
Voigt, Jens-Uwe
Fehske, Wolfgang
Kuhn, Andreas
Achenbach, Tobias
Fonseca, Jaime C.
Vilaça, João L.
D'hooge, Jan
Palavras-chaveAortic valve sizing
3D transesophageal echocardiography
Fully automatic analysis
Interactive analysis
Transcatheter aortic valve implantation
DataAbr-2018
EditoraElsevier 1
RevistaJournal of the American Society of Echocardiography
CitaçãoQueirós, S., Morais, P., Dubois, et. al. (2018). Validation of a Novel Software Tool for Automatic Aortic Annular Sizing in Three-Dimensional Transesophageal Echocardiographic Images. Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography, 31(4), 515-525
Resumo(s)Background: Accurate aortic annulus (AoA) sizing is crucial for transcatheter aortic valve implantation planning. Three-dimensional (3D) transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is a viable alternative to the standard multidetector row computed tomography (MDCT) for such assessment, with few automatic software solutions available. The aim of this study was to present and evaluate a novel software tool for automatic AoA sizing by 3D TEE.Methods: One hundred one patients who underwent both preoperative MDCT and 3D TEE were retrospectively analyzed using the software. The automatic software measurements' accuracy was compared against values obtained using standard manual MDCT, as well as against those obtained using manual 3D TEE, and intraobserver, interobserver, and test-retest reproducibility was assessed. Because the software can be used as a fully automatic or as an interactive tool, both options were addressed and contrasted. The impact of these measures on the recommended prosthesis size was then evaluated to assess if the software's automated sizes were concordant with those obtained using an MDCT- or a TEE-based manual sizing strategy.Results: The software showed very good agreement with manual values obtained using MDCT and 3D TEE, with the interactive approach having slightly narrower limits of agreement. The latter also had excellent intra- and interobserver variability. Both fully automatic and interactive analyses showed excellent test-retest reproducibility, with the first having a faster analysis time. Finally, either approach led to good sizing agreement against the true implanted sizes (> 77%) and against MDCT-based sizes (> 88%).Conclusion: Given the automated, reproducible, and fast nature of its analyses, the novel software tool pre- sented here may potentially facilitate and thus increase the use of 3D TEE for preoperative transcatheter aortic valve implantation sizing.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/58237
DOI10.1016/j.echo.2018.01.007
ISSN0894-7317
Versão da editorahttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0894731718300075
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
queiros.pdf
Acesso restrito!
3,56 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID