Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/49010

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorRamos, Carina Nogueirapor
dc.contributor.authorCarneiro, Teresapor
dc.contributor.authorGomes, Antóniopor
dc.contributor.authorLuís, Dinapor
dc.contributor.authorMartins, Sandrapor
dc.date.accessioned2018-01-04T11:37:44Z-
dc.date.available2018-01-04T11:37:44Z-
dc.date.issued2017-01-04-
dc.identifier.citationCarina Nogueira Ramos,et.al, "Staging Accuracy of Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound in Preoperative Staging of Esophageal Cancer: Results of an Referral Center". ARC Journal of Hepatology and Gastroenterology. 2017;2(1):13-18por
dc.identifier.issn2456-0022-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/49010-
dc.descriptionStaging Accuracy of Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound in Preoperative Staging of Esophageal Cancer: Results of an Referral Centerpor
dc.description.abstractIntroduction: Preoperative staging is the main prognostic factor and is crucial in therapeutic selection of esophageal cancer. Aim: Evaluate computerized tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography accuracy in preoperative esophageal cancer staging. Methods: A retrospective study between 1/1/2010 and 30/9/2015 was performed. Sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, and accuracy for T and N stage was calculated. Using the Cohen weighted K, the degree of concordance between the exams and anatomopathological results was assessed. Results: Computerized tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography presented an accuracy of 35.7% (95%CI, 17.9-53.4) and 64.3% (95%CI, 46.5-82) for T, and 57.1% (95%CI, 38.8-75.4) and 71.4% (95%CI, 54.6-88.1) for N. Computerized tomography presented an sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values of 12.5%(95%CI, 0.32-52.6), 85%(95%CI, 62.1-96.8), 25%(95%CI, 0.63-80.6), 70.8%(95%CI, 48.9-87.4) for T1; 33.3%(95%CI, 4.3-77.7), 68.2%(95%CI, 45.1-86.1), 22.2%(95%CI, 2.8-60), 78.9%(95%CI, 54.4-93.9) for T2; 50%(95%CI, 23-77), 57.1%(95%CI, 28.9-82.3), 53.8%(95%CI, 25.1-80.8), 53.3%(95%CI, 26.6-78.1) for T3; 30%(95%CI, 6.67-65.25), 72.2%(95%CI, 46.5-90.3), 37.5%(95%CI, 8.5-75.5), 65%(95%CI, 40.8- 84.6) for N. For endoscopic ultrasonography: 62.5%(95%CI, 0-40.96), 95%(95%CI, 75.1-99.9),83.3%(95%CI, 35.9-99.6), 86.4%(95%CI, 65.1-97.1) for T1; 50%(95%CI, 11.8-88.2), 77.3%(95%CI, 54.6- 92.2), 37.5%(95%CI, 8.5-75.6), 85%(95%CI, 62.1-96.8) for T2; 71.4%(95%CI, 41.9-91.6), 71.4%(95%CI, 41.9-91.6), 71.4%(95%CI, 41.9-91.6), 71.4%(95%CI, 41.9-91.6) for T3; 90%(95%CI, 55.5-99.7), 61.1%(95CI, 35.7-82.7), 56.2%(95%CI, 29.9-80.2), 92%(95%CI, 62.5-99.8) for N. Concordance was poor for computerized tomography and moderate for endoscopic ultrasonography. Conclusions: Endoscopic ultrasonography has a better accuracy in esophageal cancer staging, for T and N, showing a high sensibility, specificity, positive and negative predictive values, with a better accuracy for T3. Only endoscopic ultrasonography showed a significant relationship with an atom pathological results (p<0.05).por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherARC Publicationspor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectEsophageal cancerpor
dc.subjectStaging accuracypor
dc.subjectEndoscopic ultrasonographypor
dc.subjectComputerized tomographypor
dc.titleStaging Accuracy of Computed Tomography and Endoscopic Ultrasound in Preoperative Staging of Esophageal Cancer: Results of an Referral Centerpor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.arcjournals.org/journal-of-gastroenterology/volume-2-issue-1/3por
oaire.citationStartPage13por
oaire.citationEndPage18por
oaire.citationIssue1por
oaire.citationVolume2por
dc.date.updated2017-12-19T09:48:03Z-
dc.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Medicina Básicapor
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
sdum.journalARC Journal of Hepatology and Gastroenterologypor
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
95.pdf216 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID