Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

TitleArthroscopic and open repair of massive rotator cuff tears have similar results: a systematic review
Author(s)Sevivas, Nuno
Ferreira, Nuno
Andrade, Renato
Moreira, Pedro
Sousa, Nuno
Salgado, A. J.
Mendes, João Espregueira
Issue date11-Jul-2017
PublisherInternational Society of Arthroscopy, Knee Surgery and Orthopaedic Sports Medicine (ISAKOS)
JournalJournal of ISAKOS
Abstract(s)Importance The surgical outcomes of massive rotator cuff tears (MRCTs) repair are poorly reported in the scientific literature. Objective This study aimed to evaluate the reported outcomes of open or arthroscopic repair of MRCTs. Evidence review We comprehensively searched the Medline, Scopus, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews and CENTRAL databases up to January 2017. We included studies with a prospective design assessing the outcomes of open or arthroscopic repair of MRCTs, with a minimum of 1 year of follow-up. We excluded studies in which subgrouping of massive tears was not possible. We assessed the methodological quality of the studies using the Coleman methodology score. Findings We included 12 studies (comprising 990 patients, 511 of whom had an MRCT): eight reported the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair outcomes, two reported open repair and the other two reported the outcomes of both techniques. The mean follow-up time was 57 months (range 12–108). A quantitative synthesis of the arthroscopic rotator cuff repair results showed clinical improvements in the Constant and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores from preoperatively to postoperatively. Comparing the arthroscopic and open repair procedures, we observed similar pooled weighted means for the Constant, University of California, Los Angeles and American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores at 26–56 months of follow-up. Conclusions and relevance Both arthroscopic and open repair produced similar and improved postoperative outcomes to those preoperatively. MRCT repair requires further research and better reporting to obtain stronger conclusions. Level of evidence Level II, systematic review and meta-analysis.
AccessRestricted access (UMinho)
Appears in Collections:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Arthroscopic and open repair of massive rotator cuff tears have similar results - a systematic review (2).pdf
  Restricted access
213,6 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID