Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/44901

TítuloDetection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: systematic review and meta-analysis
Autor(es)Gama, Ricardo Ribeiro Gama
Carvalho, André Lopes
Longatto Filho, Adhemar
Scorsato, Anderson Paulo
Mendoza Lopez, Rossana V.
Rautava, Jaana
Syrjanen, Stina
Syrjanen, Kari
Palavras-chaveLaryngeal cancer
papillomavirus
meta-analysis
meta-regression
study heterogeneity
publication bias
detection method
geographic region
Data2016
EditoraWiley
RevistaLaryngoscope
CitaçãoGama, R. R., Carvalho, A. L., Filho, A. L., Scorsato, A. P., López, R. V. M., Rautava, J., . . . Syrjänen, K. (2016). Detection of human papillomavirus in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma: Systematic review and meta-analysis. [Review]. Laryngoscope, 126(4), 885-893. doi: 10.1002/lary.25738
Resumo(s)Background: Recent studies have reported a human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence of 20% to 30% in laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC), although clinical data on HPV involvement remain largely inconsistent, ascribed by some to differences in HPV detection methods or in geographic origin of the studies. Objective To perform a systematic review and formal meta-analysis of the literature reporting on HPV detection in LSCC. Methods Literature was searched from January 1964 until March 2015. The effect size was calculated as event rates (95% confidence interval [CI]), with homogeneity testing using Cochran's Q and I2 statistics. Meta-regression was used to test the impact of study-level covariates (HPV detection method, geographic origin) on effect size. Potential publication bias was estimated using funnel plot symmetry. Results One hundred seventy nine studies were eligible, comprising a sample size of 7,347 LSCCs from different geographic regions. Altogether, 1,830 (25%) cases tested HPV-positive considering all methods, with effect size of 0.269 (95% CI: 0.242 to 0.297; random-effects model). In meta-analysis stratified by the 1) HPV detection technique and 2) geographic study origin, the between-study heterogeneity was significant only for geographic origin (P = .0001). In meta-regression, the HPV detection method (P = .876) or geographic origin (P = .234) were not significant study-level covariates. Some evidence for publication bias was found only for studies from North America and those using non–polymerase chain reaction methods, with a marginal effect on adjusted point estimates for both. Conclusions Variability in HPV detection rates in LSCC is explained by geographic origin of study but not by HPV detection method. However, they were not significant study-level covariates in formal meta-regression.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/44901
DOI10.1002/lary.25738
ISSN0023-852X
Versão da editorahttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/lary.25738/abstract;jsessionid=379288F86A23F14CC19F67288D04F27B.f04t03
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
gama_et_al-2016-the_laryngoscope.pdf144,8 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID