Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/56070

TítuloMethodology to identify and prioritise the social aspects to be considered in the design of more sustainable residential buildings - Application to a developing country
Autor(es)Ardda, N.
Mateus, Ricardo
Bragança, L.
Palavras-chaveBuilding Sustainability Assessment Tool for West Bank (WB-BSATool)
residential buildings
social priorities
social sustainability
sustainability indicators
DataSet-2018
EditoraMDPI
RevistaBuildings
CitaçãoArdda N., Mateus R., Bragança L. Methodology to Identify and Prioritise the Social Aspects to Be Considered in the Design of More Sustainable Residential Buildings—Application to a Developing Country, Buildings, Vol. 8, Issue 10, pp. 1-17, doi:10.3390/buildings8100130, 2018
Resumo(s)The priorities in the design of more sustainable buildings are quite dependent on the specific social context. In developing countries, the sustainability concept and priorities in the residential buildings sector are quite different from the ones of the developed countries, since there are still basic needs to answer. Therefore, this research is aimed at contributing to a better understanding of the concept of social sustainability in the residential building sector of the developing countries. A methodology to define and prioritise the social sustainability indicators is proposed and applied in the context of Palestine. The presented methodology is based on the sustainability indicators of international standards, on the most well know building sustainability assessment methods and in the analysis of their application to a specific context. It includes a methodology to prioritise the list of social indicators, by considering the expectations of two groups of building stakeholders: designers and building users. At the end, this research proposes a framework of social aspects to consider in the design of more sustainable residential buildings in West Bank, Palestine that is composed of twenty-one indicators, distributed among six sustainability categories and ranked according to their weight in the overall of sustainability level.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/56070
DOI10.3390/buildings8100130
ISSN2075-5309
Versão da editorahttps://www.mdpi.com/2075-5309/8/10/130
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:C-TAC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2863-ArddaN_MateusR_BragancaL_Buildings2018.pdf429,96 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID