Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/50344

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorCosta, Luíspor
dc.contributor.authorGago, Miguel F.por
dc.contributor.authorYelshyna, Daryapor
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Jaimepor
dc.contributor.authorSilva, Hélder David Malheiropor
dc.contributor.authorRocha, Luís Alexandre Machadopor
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Nunopor
dc.contributor.authorBicho, Estelapor
dc.date.accessioned2018-02-12T11:29:40Z-
dc.date.available2018-02-12T11:29:40Z-
dc.date.issued2016-01-09-
dc.identifier.citationCosta, L., Gago, M. F., Yelshyna, D., Ferreira, J., David Silva, H., Rocha, L., ... & Bicho, E. (2016). Application of machine learning in postural control kinematics for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. Computational intelligence and neuroscience, 2016por
dc.identifier.issn1687-5265-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/50344-
dc.description.abstractThe use of wearable devices to study gait and postural control is a growing field on neurodegenerative disorders such as Alzheimer's disease (AD). In this paper, we investigate if machine-learning classifiers offer the discriminative power for the diagnosis of AD based on postural control kinematics. We compared Support VectorMachines (SVMs), Multiple Layer Perceptrons (MLPs), Radial Basis Function Neural Networks (RBNs), and Deep Belief Networks (DBNs) on 72 participants (36 AD patients and 36 healthy subjects) exposed to seven increasingly difficult postural tasks. The decisional space was composed of 18 kinematic variables (adjusted for age, education, height, and weight), with or without neuropsychological evaluation (Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA) score), top ranked in an error incremental analysis. Classification results were based on threefold cross validation of 50 independent and randomized runs sets: training (50%), test (40%), and validation (10%). Having a decisional space relying solely on postural kinematics, accuracy of AD diagnosis ranged from 71.7 to 86.1%. Adding the MoCA variable, the accuracy ranged between 91 and 96.6%. MLP classifier achieved top performance in both decisional spaces. Having comprehended the interdynamic interaction between postural stability and cognitive performance, our results endorse machine-learning models as a useful tool for computer-aided diagnosis of AD based on postural control kinematics.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe Algoritmi Center was funded by the FP7 ITN Marie Curie Neural Engineering Transformative Technologies (NETT) projectpor
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationpor
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.titleApplication of machine learning in postural control kinematics for the diagnosis of Alzheimer’s diseasepor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.hindawi.com/journals/cin/2016/3891253/abs/por
oaire.citationIssue891253por
oaire.citationVolume2016por
dc.date.updated2018-01-17T15:32:17Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2016/3891253por
dc.identifier.pmid28074090por
dc.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Medicina Básicapor
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalComputational Intelligence and Neurosciencepor
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals
DEI - Artigos em revistas internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
costa, sousa, comp intell 2016.pdf
Acesso restrito!
3,7 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID