Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/91340

TítuloDevices used for photobiomodulation of the brain-a comprehensive and systematic review
Autor(es)Fernandes, Filipa
Oliveira, Sofia
Monteiro, Francisca
Gasik, Michael
Silva, Filipe Samuel
Sousa, Nuno
Carvalho, Óscar
Catarino, Susana Oliveira
Palavras-chaveBrain
Cognition
Lasers
Low-Level Light Therapy
Data2024
EditoraBMC
RevistaJournal of Neuroengineering and Rehabilitation
CitaçãoF Fernandes, S Oliveira, F Monteiro, M Gasik, FS Silva, N Sousa, Ó Carvalho, SO Catarino, Devices used for photobiomodulation of the brain – a comprehensive and systematic review, Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 21, 53, 2024 (DOI: 10.1186/s12984-024-01351-8)
Resumo(s)A systematic review was conducted to determine the trends in devices and parameters used for brain photobiomodulation (PBM). The revised studies included clinical and cadaveric approaches, in which light stimuli were applied to the head and/or neck. PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar databases were used for the systematic search. A total of 2133 records were screened, from which 97 were included in this review. The parameters that were extracted and analysed in each article were the device design, actuation area, actuation site, wavelength, mode of operation, power density, energy density, power output, energy per session and treatment time. To organize device information, 11 categories of devices were defined, according to their characteristics. The most used category of devices was laser handpieces, which relate to 21% of all devices, while 28% of the devices were not described. Studies for cognitive function and physiological characterisation are the most well defined ones and with more tangible results. There is a lack of consistency when reporting PBM studies, with several articles under defining the stimulation protocol, and a wide variety of parameters used for the same health conditions (e.g., Alzheimer's or Parkinson's disease) resulting in positive outcomes. Standardization for the report of these studies is warranted, as well as sham-controlled comparative studies to determine which parameters have the greatest effect on PBM treatments for different neurological conditions.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/91340
DOI10.1186/s12984-024-01351-8
Versão da editorahttps://jneuroengrehab.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12984-024-01351-8
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CMEMS - Artigos em revistas internacionais/Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
s12984-024-01351-8.pdf2,17 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID