Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSantos, Lívia-
dc.contributor.authorRodrigues, Diana Alexandra Ferreira-
dc.contributor.authorLira, Madalena-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, M. Elisabete-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, Rosário-
dc.contributor.authorYebra-Pimentel Vilar, Eva-
dc.contributor.authorAzeredo, Joana-
dc.identifier.citation"Optometry and Vision Science." ISSN 1040-5488. 85:7 (Jul. 2008) 520-525.en
dc.description.abstractPurpose. The aim of this study was to, firstly, investigate whether silicone-hydrogel contact lenses (CL) are more or less susceptible to bacterial adhesion than conventional ones and, secondly, assess the influence of lens wear in the extent of bacterial adhesion. Four silicone-hydrogel CL (galyfilcon A, balafilcon A, lotrafilcon A, and lotrafilcon B) and one conventional hydrogel (etafilcon A) CL were tested. Methods. Bacterial adhesion experiments were performed on unworn and worn CL using the strain Staphylococcus epidermidis 9142. Worn lenses were obtained from a group of 31 subjects fitted with a silicone-hydrogel CL in one eye and a conventional hydrogel CL as contralateral pair. These lenses were used on a daily basis in combination with a multipurpose lens care solution. Adhesion assays were carried out in a parallel plate flow chamber, followed by image analysis. Hydrophobicity, roughness, and topography of the lenses surfaces were assessed through contact angle measurements and atomic force microscopy. Results. Unworn conventional and silicone-hydrogel CL were equally susceptible to bacterial adhesion of S. epidermidis. Conversely, worn conventional hydrogel (etafilcon A) were more prone to bacterial adhesion than worn silicone-hydrogel materials, which exhibited similar adhesion extents among them. The results also showed that the lens surface properties such as hydrophobicity, roughness, and surface topography changed during wear. The alteration of surface hydrophobicity of silicone and conventional hydrogel CL during wear had a great impact on lens bacterial adhesion susceptibility. Accordingly, balafilcon A becomes significantly less hydrophobic and less prone to bacterial adhesion after lens wear, whereas etafilcon A becomes more hydrophobic and also more susceptible to bacterial adhesion (p < 0.05). Conclusions. Worn silicone-hydrogel galyfilcon A, balafilcon A, lotrafilcon A, and lotrafilcon B are equally prone to microbial adhesion of S. epidermidis and generally less susceptible than the conventional hydrogel.en
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) - POCI/FCB/44.628/2002, BD 19679/2004por
dc.publisherAmerican Academy of Optometry (AAOPT)en
dc.subjectSilicone Hydrogelen
dc.subjectS. epidermidis adhesionen
dc.titleBacterial adhesion to worn silicone hydrogel contact lensesen
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalOptometry and Vision Sciencepor
Appears in Collections:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
OVS.pdf1,71 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID