Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/56081

TitleImpacts of low frequency noise exposure on well-being: A case-study from Portugal
Author(s)Alves, J. A.
Silva, Lígia Torres
Remoaldo, Paula Cristina Almeida
Keywordsaudiometric testing
human well-being
noise discomfort
noise pollution
power poles and power lines
Issue dateAug-2018
PublisherWolters Kluwer
JournalNoise & Health
CitationAlves J. A., Silva L. T., Remoaldo P. C. Impacts of Low Frequency Noise Exposure on Well-Being: A Case-Study From Portugal, Noise & Health, Vol. 20, Issue 95, pp. 131-145, doi: 10.4103/nah.NAH_64_17, 2018
Abstract(s)The aim of this article is to assess the impacts of low frequency noise, emitted by high-voltage lines and power poles, on the perception of discomfort, comparing two different groups of inhabitants (exposed and unexposed groups) in two areas in the Northwest of Portugal. It proposes a new oriented methodology to assess discomfort due to the low frequency noise. Materials and Methods: Two predominantly urban areas were used to test the methodology: an ?exposed? area with a high presence of the source under study and an ?unexposed? area without records of power transmission lines. The research developed included measuring sound levels (in frequency bands from 10 to 160 Hz) with the help of a sound level meter in the two selected urban areas. Results: The real sound coming from the source was recorded and reproduced in an audiometric testing booth to determine the hearing threshold and discomfort of the volunteers. Using the criteria curve developed by DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs/University of Salford) in 2011, the results reveal that the sound levels recorded for the ?exposed? group were higher than that for the ?unexposed? group. The first recording showed an average of 68.9 dB and the second 64.6 dB, resulting in a significant difference of 4.3 dB between the two groups. After an attempt to isolate the source, the difference was 5.6 dB. Regarding the adapted audiometric tests, the real sound was used, which was collected 5mbetween the receiver and the source. Conclusion: These results provide support that at this distance the noise was considered annoying.
TypeArticle
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/56081
DOI10.4103/nah.NAH_64_17
ISSN1463-1741
Publisher versionwww.noiseandhealth.org
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessRestricted access (UMinho)
Appears in Collections:C-TAC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais
Lab2PT - Artigos
Lab2PT - Artigos

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2850-NoiseHealth_2018_20_95_131_239584.pdf
  Restricted access
3,95 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy!

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID