Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/49657

TitleBiomedical microfluidic devices by using low-cost fabrication techniques: a review
Author(s)Faustino, Vera
Catarino, Susana Oliveira
Lima, Rui Alberto Madeira Macedo
Minas, Graça
KeywordsLow-cost
Biomedical microdevices
Biomicrofluidics
Soft lithography
Nonlithographic technique
Issue dateJul-2016
PublisherElsevier
JournalJournal of Biomechanics
Abstract(s)One of the most popular methods to fabricate biomedical microfluidic devices is by using a soft lithography technique. However, the fabrication of the moulds to produce microfluidic devices, such as SU-8 moulds, usually requires a cleanroom environment that can be quite costly. Therefore, many efforts have been made to develop low-cost alternatives for the fabrication of microstructures, avoiding the use of cleanroom facilities. Recently, low-cost techniques without cleanroom facilities that feature aspect ratios more than 20, for fabricating those SU-8 moulds have been gaining popularity among biomedical research community. In those techniques, Ultraviolet (UV) exposure equipment, commonly used in the Printed Circuit Board (PCB) industry, replaces the more expensive and less available Mask Aligner that has been used in the last 15 years for SU-8 patterning. Alternatively, non-lithographic low-cost techniques, due to their ability for large-scale production, have increased the interest of the industrial and research community to develop simple, rapid and low-cost microfluidic structures. These alternative techniques include Print and Peel methods (PAP), laserjet, solid ink, cutting plotters or micromilling, that use equipment available in almost all laboratories and offices. An example is the xurography technique that uses a cutting plotter machine and adhesive vinyl films to generate the master moulds to fabricate microfluidic channels. In this review, we present a selection of the most recent lithographic and non lithographic low-cost techniques to fabricate microfluidic structures, focused on the features and limitations of each technique. Only microfabrication methods that do not require the use of cleanrooms are considered. Additionally, potential applications of these microfluidic devices in biomedical engineering are presented with some illustrative examples.
TypeArticle
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/49657
DOI10.1016/j.jbiomech.2015.11.031
ISSN0021-9290
e-ISSN1873-2380
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessRestricted access (Author)
Appears in Collections:DEI - Artigos em revistas internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Final Published Version - 1-s2.0-S0021929015006739-main.pdf
  Restricted access
3,41 MBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID