Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/41977

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorCarvalho, Graça Simões depor
dc.contributor.authorAraújo, Maria Cristina Panserapor
dc.contributor.authorBoff, Eva Teresinha de Oliveirapor
dc.contributor.authorTracana, Rosa Brancapor
dc.contributor.authorNunes, Luís Sabogapor
dc.contributor.editorLavonen, J.por
dc.contributor.editorJuuti, K.por
dc.contributor.editorLampiselkä, J.por
dc.contributor.editorUitto, A.por
dc.contributor.editorHahl, K.por
dc.date.accessioned2016-06-14T14:09:24Z-
dc.date.available2016-06-14T14:09:24Z-
dc.date.issued2016-
dc.identifier.isbn978-951-51-1541-6por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/41977-
dc.descriptionESERA Conference Proceedings series, vol. 4por
dc.description.abstractSeveral scales have been built to evaluate the health literacy levels of populations. For this study the European Health Literacy Survey (HLS-EU) (Sorensen, 2012) was selected to assess the health literacy levels in a diversified sample of higher education students and lecturers. The main goal was to evaluate whether this European HLS-EU scale is appropriate for discriminating health literacy levels in a higher education population, including university and polytechnic students and lecturers of different scientific fields and educational levels, since undergraduates up to university lecturers. Four groups of participants were obtained: (i) 21 undergraduate students in agribusiness, (ii) 40 undergraduate students in computational science, (iii) 31 master students and professionals in the field of health; (iv) 87 master, PhD students and lecturers holding a master or PhD degree, most of them in the field of Education. The Cronbach's alpha test showed that the global HLS-EU-BR, the Disease Prevention items and Health Promotion items had “Excellent” internal consistency (0.95, 0.90 and 0.90, respectively) and Healthcare items had “Good” internal consistency (0.89). The majority of the respondents exhibited “Problematic” (37.4%) and “Sufficient” (34.7%) health literacy. “Inadequate” health literacy was found in 17.3% of the respondents and only 10.6% showed “Excellent” health literacy. No differences (p>0.05) were found between age groups. Females had higher levels of health literacy as compared with men (p<0.05). As expected, strong differences (p<0.0001) on health literacy were found between groups having and having not experience in working in the health sector or having health training. Having in mind that this sample is mainly composed of teachers and teachers to be, these results indicate that more emphasis in health issues should be given in teachers training in order to make teachers more sensitive to healthy issues and to get better competencies for teaching these issues in basic education.por
dc.description.sponsorshipCIEC - Centro de Investigação em Estudos da Criança, IE, UMinho (UI 317 da FCT)por
dc.description.sponsorshipUID/CED/00317/2013por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherEuropean Science Education Research Association (ESERA)por
dc.relationinfo:eu-repo/grantAgreement/FCT/5876/147313/PTpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectHealth literacy levelspor
dc.subjectDisease preventionpor
dc.subjectHealthcarepor
dc.subjectHealth promotionpor
dc.subjectUniversity populationpor
dc.titleEuropean health literacy scale (HLS-EU-BR) applied in a Brazilian higher education population of Rio Grande do Sul (RS)por
dc.typebookPartpor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.esera.org/media/eBook%202015/eBook_Part_9_links_x.pdfpor
oaire.citationStartPage1289por
oaire.citationEndPage1295por
oaire.citationTitleScience education research: engaging learners for a sustainable future (Proceedings of ESERA 2015)por
dc.subject.fosCiências Sociais::Ciências da Educaçãopor
sdum.bookTitleScience education research: engaging learners for a sustainable future (Proceedings of ESERA 2015)por
Aparece nas coleções:CIEC - Livros e Capítulos de Livros

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
ESERA_HLS-EU-BR.pdf467,92 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID