Open research for diffusion of open digital memories at Web 2.0/3.0

Abstract

This paper suggests an experimental perspective of Open Research, understood as a process of deconstruction of knowledge about society that leads to its reconstruction, archiving and dissemination in the form of Open Digital Memories. This posture was developed within the Project Public Communication of Art: the Case of Global / Local Art Museums, at the University of Lisbon. The project was funded by Foundation for Science and Technology, and produced 6 books and 8 sites, among other final results. Researching and memorizing may be pursuited through an open style that includes the production and reception of investigation by both the researcher and the common citizen. This may involve multiple shared tasks: questioning the social, organization and critique of sources and data, co-participation in the use of methods, public discussions on work in progress and on research results. For this aim, Open Research must articulate Social Sciences and Humanities to New Media, specially across digital social networks, both at Web 2.0 (the Reading/Writing Internet) and at Web 3.0 (the so-called Semantic Web). Two strategies contributing to this posture will be exemplified, within the optics of Semantic-Logic Sociology: Experimental Books and Social Semantic-Logic Sites. They use the following instruments for producing/writing and receiving/reading social and semantic knowledge, some of these shown in the present paper: Visual Ontologies built from Social Hybridologies, GeoNeoLogic Methods (Multitouch Questionnaire, Trichotomies Game, etc..), Conceptual Abstracts, Present Books, Author-Actor Maps, GeoNeoLogic Novels, Visual Social Ontologies, Knowledge Interactive Windows, Visual Socio-Semantic Indexes, Visual Meta-Semantic Indexes. In short, Open Research and Open Digital Memories may constitute some of the fundamental pillars of emergent Research Society. This means a social paradigm where common citizens may become a sort of ‘lay researchers’ and, in the process, reformulate contemporary expert’s knowledge and power.