Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorLopez, Maria José-
dc.contributor.authorFernández, Esteve-
dc.contributor.authorGorini, Giuseppe-
dc.contributor.authorMoshammer, Hanns-
dc.contributor.authorPolanska, Kinga-
dc.contributor.authorClancy, Luke-
dc.contributor.authorDautzenberg, Bertrand-
dc.contributor.authorDelrieu, Agnes-
dc.contributor.authorInvernizzi, Giovanny-
dc.contributor.authorMuñoz, Glòria-
dc.contributor.authorPrecioso, José-
dc.contributor.authorRuprecht, Ario A.-
dc.contributor.authorStansty, Peter-
dc.contributor.authorHanke, Wojciech-
dc.contributor.authorNebot, Manel-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Outdoor secondhand smoke (SHS) concentrations are usually lower than indoor concentrations, yet some studies have shown that outdoor SHS levels could be comparable to indoor levels under specific conditions. The main objectives of this study were to assess levels of SHS exposure in terraces and other outdoor areas of hospitality venues and to evaluate their potential displacement to adjacent indoor areas. Methods: Nicotine and respirable particles (PM2.5) were measured in outdoor and indoor areas of hospitality venues of 8 European countries. Hospitality venues of the study included night bars, restaurants and bars. The fieldwork was carried out between March 2009 and March 2011. Results: We gathered 170 nicotine and 142 PM2.5 measurements during the study. The median indoor SHS concentration was significantly higher in venues where smoking was allowed (nicotine 3.69 mg/m3, PM2.5: 120.51 mg/m3) than in those where smoking was banned (nicotine: 0.48 mg/m3, PM2.5: 36.90 mg/m3). The median outdoor nicotine concentration was higher in places where indoor smoking was banned (1.56 mg/m3) than in venues where smoking was allowed (0.31 mg/m3). Among the different types of outdoor areas, the highest median outdoor SHS levels (nicotine: 4.23 mg/m3, PM2.5: 43.64 mg/ m3) were found in the semi-closed outdoor areas of venues where indoor smoking was banned. Conclusions: Banning indoor smoking seems to displace SHS exposure to adjacent outdoor areas. Furthermore, indoor settings where smoking is banned but which have a semi-closed outdoor area have higher levels of SHS than those with open outdoor areas, possibly indicating that SHS also drifts from outdoors to indoors. Current legislation restricting indoor SHS levels seems to be insufficient to protect hospitality workers – and patrons – from SHS exposure. Tobacco-free legislation should take these results into account and consider restrictions in the terraces of some hospitality venues to ensure effective protectionpor
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by the Executive Agency for Health and Consumers, DG SANCO, European Commission, grant number 2007313. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.por
dc.publisherPublic Library of Science (PLOS)por
dc.titleExposure to secondhand smoke in terraces and other outdoor areas of hospitality venues in eight european countriespor
oaire.citationTitlePLOS ONEpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalPLOS ONEpor
Appears in Collections:CIEd - Artigos em revistas científicas internacionais com arbitragem

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Exposure to secondhand smoke in terraces and other outdoor areas of hspitality venues in eight european Countries.pdf
  Restricted access
82,67 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID