Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/73883
Título: | Portuguese validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised and the philadelphia mindfulness scale |
Autor(es): | Teixeira, R. Ferreira, Gabriela Maria Magalhães Pereira, M. Graça |
Palavras-chave: | Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale Alexithymia Self-differentiation |
Data: | Mar-2017 |
Editora: | Elsevier España |
Revista: | Mindfulness & Compassion |
Citação: | Teixeira, R. J., Ferreira, G., & Pereira, M. G. (2017). Portuguese validation of the cognitive and affective mindfulness scale-revised and the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale. Mindfulness & Compassion, 2(1), 3-8 |
Resumo(s): | Objectives
The purpose of this study was the validation of two instruments: Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) and the Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) in a non-clinical Portuguese sample.
Methods
Participants were 168 undergraduates (123 women), aged 18–50 years old (M = 22; SD = 5.94). Participants answered the following instruments: Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R); Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS); Portuguese version of the Toronto Alexithymia Scale; and Separation/Individuation Process Inventory.
Results
The factorial analysis for the CAMS-R yielded a 9-items one factor with adequate internal consistency (.76). For PHLMS, the results showed a clear two-factor structure with exactly the same structure as the original version, and with adequate internal consistencies: awareness (.77) and acceptance (.85). The quality of mindfulness (CAMS-R) was positively correlated with awareness and acceptance (PHLMS), and negatively with self-differentiation (more problematic) and alexithymia.
Conclusion
Both instruments seem to present adequate psychometric properties to be used in the Portuguese population. Objetivos El presente estudio evalúa la validación de dos instrumentos: la Cognitive and Affective Mindfulness Scale-Revised (CAMS-R) y la Philadelphia Mindfulness Scale (PHLMS) en una muestra portuguesa no clínica. Métodos Participaron 168 estudiantes (123 mujeres), con una edad de entre 18 y 50 años (M = 22; DE = 5,94). Los participantes respondieron a los siguientes instrumentos: CAMS-R; PHLMS; versión en portugués de la Escala de Alexitimia de Toronto, e Inventario del Proceso de Separación/Individuación. Resultados El análisis factorial de la CAMS-R produjo un factor de 9 artículos con una coherencia interna adecuada (0,76). Los resultados de la PHLMS mostraron una clara estructura de dos factores exactamente con la misma estructura que la versión original y con coherencias internas adecuadas: conciencia (0,77) y aceptación (0,85). La calidad de la conciencia plena o mindfulness (CAMS-R) se correlacionó positivamente con la conciencia y la aceptación (PHLMS), y negativamente con la autodiferenciación (más problemática) y la alexitimia. Conclusión Parece que ambos instrumentos presentan propiedades psicométricas adecuadas para ser utilizados en la población portuguesa. |
Tipo: | Artigo |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/73883 |
DOI: | 10.1016/j.mincom.2017.03.001 |
ISSN: | 2445-4079 |
Versão da editora: | https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S244540791630043X |
Arbitragem científica: | yes |
Acesso: | Acesso restrito UMinho |
Aparece nas coleções: | CIPsi - Artigos (Papers) |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
PortuguesevalidationoftheCognitiveandAffectiveMindfulnessScale-RevisedandthePhiladelphiaMindfulnessScale.pdf Acesso restrito! | 504,1 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |