Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/71878

TítuloMulti-criteria methodology for selection of wastewater treatment systems with economic, social, technical and environmental aspects
Autor(es)Lizot, Mauro
Goffi, Andreia S.
Thesari, Shirley S.
Trojan, Flavio
Afonso, Paulo
Ferreira, Paula Varandas
Palavras-chaveWastewater treatment systems
Multi-criteria methods
AHP
ELECTRE II
Criteria selection
Data2021
EditoraSpringer
RevistaEnvironment, Development and Sustainability
CitaçãoLizot, M., Goffi, A.S., Thesari, S.S. et al. Multi-criteria methodology for selection of wastewater treatment systems with economic, social, technical and environmental aspects. Environ Dev Sustain (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00906-8
Resumo(s)The design, implementation and use of wastewater treatment systems (WTS) are fundamental to mitigate hydrological and environmental problems, and to improve population health. Furthermore, the significant advances in treatment systems technology offer, nowadays, several alternatives and provide many combinations of WTS which must be correctly evaluated and constitute a decision problem for public and private investors and decision makers. Thus, this article presents a multi-criteria methodology based on six steps for the evaluation of WTS considering relevant economic, social, technical and environmental criteria. Particularly, forty-eight main criteria were identified and ranked considering their importance based on the previous literature. This methodology was applied in a Brazilian sanitation company in a specific treatment area of approximately five thousand inhabitants and with recurrent environmental problems, such as the contamination and low efficiency of wastewater treatment. Twenty available alternatives were considered and twelve criteria were selected for this application. The AHP and ELECTRE II methods were combined to weight the different criteria and to rank the most suitable WTS. This methodology can be extended and applied in different scenarios to improve the decision-making process.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/71878
DOI10.1007/s10668-020-00906-8
ISSN1387-585X
e-ISSN1573-2975
Versão da editorahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10668-020-00906-8
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:CAlg - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Lizot et al (2020).pdf
Acesso restrito!
Lizot et al (2020)728,44 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID