Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/70118

TítuloValidation of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders' patients
Autor(es)Vaz, Ana Rita Rendeiro Ribeiro
Conceição, Eva Martins
Silva, Ana Isabel Pinto Bastos Leite
Silva, Daniela
Machado, Paulo P. P.
Palavras-chaveClinical impairment
Eating disorders
Psychometrics
Portuguese version
DataJun-2020
EditoraSpringer
RevistaEating and Weight Disorders-Studies on Anorexia Bulimia and Obesity
CitaçãoVaz, A.R., Conceição, E., Pinto-Bastos, A. et al. Validation of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders’ patients. Eat Weight Disord 25, 627–635 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40519-019-00661-4
Resumo(s)Purpose: The purpose of the study was to assess the psychometric properties of the Portuguese version of the Clinical Impairment Assessment (CIA) in eating disorders (ED) patients. Method The CIA is a 16-item brief self-reported instrument developed to assess psychosocial impairment secondary to EDs. The CIA was administered to a clinical sample of 237 women with EDs and a college sample of 196 women. The clinical sample completed the Eating Disorders Examination Questionnaire, the Beck Depression Inventory and the Outcome-45 Questionnaire. Reliability, confirmatory factor analysis, validity, and clinically significant change were calculated. Results Confirmatory factor analysis validated the original 3-factor structure showing an adequate model fit. CIA showed good psychometric properties with high internal consistency, good convergent validity with the EDE-Q, the OQ-45, and the BDI. For divergent validity, participants CIA scores in the clinical sample were significantly higher than in the non-clinical sample. ROC curve analysis provided a cutoff of 15. For known-groups validity participants' scoring above CIA cutoff reported significantly higher CIA scores. In addition, non-underweight participants and participants reporting the presence of dysfunctional ED behaviors had significantly higher CIA scores. Finally, for clinically significant change, a reliable change index of 5 points was obtained to consider a reliable change in the CIA global score. Conclusions Our findings support the validity and clinical utility of the CIA as a good self-report measure to be used in both clinical and research settings.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/70118
DOI10.1007/s40519-019-00661-4
ISSN1124-4909
e-ISSN1590-1262
Versão da editorahttps://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40519-019-00661-4
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso restrito UMinho
Aparece nas coleções:CIPsi - Artigos (Papers)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
CIA_FINAL_Submissão_REP_2020.pdf
Acesso restrito!
Accepted Manuscript530,28 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID