Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/67375

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorVicente, Anna Luiza Silva Almeidapor
dc.contributor.authorBianchini, Raquel Alvespor
dc.contributor.authorLaus, Ana Carolinapor
dc.contributor.authorMacedo, Grazielapor
dc.contributor.authorReis, R. M.por
dc.contributor.authorVazquez, Vinicius de Limapor
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-08T10:22:47Z-
dc.date.issued2019-09-
dc.identifier.issn0213-3911-
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/67375-
dc.description.abstractMelanin is produced by melanocytes and protects against DNA damage by ultraviolet light. Unfortunately, the melanin protein present in melanoma tumor cells is often co-purified during DNA extraction, and this contamination may inhibit subsequent PCR methods, which directly impacts research applications and the molecular diagnostic tests needed for targeted therapeutics. There are presently no described purification protocols that efficiently remove melanin from genomic DNA. In this study, we compare six different methods for melanin removal from genomic DNA: Agarose Gel Electrophoresis, 1mg Chelex®-100, Chelex®-100 5%, centrifugation, OneStep™ PCR Inhibitor Removal Kit and centrifugation plus OneStep™ PCR Inhibitor Removal Kit. Each comparison was made using 16 formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) and 11 fresh cell line samples. All samples were initially tested using the multiplex PCR reaction for GAPDH gene that generates different sized amplified products: 100, 200, 300 and 400 base pairs, which could be inhibited by the addition of exogenous melanin. Six purification protocols were then applied, and all samples that amplified at least one GAPDH fragment were sequenced to analyze the presence of the BRAF V600E mutation. The efficiencies of amplification decreased for larger sized fragments in all methods. Our comparisons showed that centrifugation combined with the OneStep™ PCR Inhibitor Removal Kit was superior to all other methods for successful BRAF sequencing with 100% (100bp), 75% (200bp), 50% (300bp), and 31.3% (400bp) amplification efficiencies for the different amplicon sizes. In conclusion, this genomic DNA extraction method is highly efficient for successful PCR when tumor samples are contaminated with melanin.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors would like to express their sincere thanks to the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP) for its funding of this research (Vazquez's Grant #2012/04194-1, Vicente's Doctoral Fellowship Grant #2016/15941-3 and Vicente's International Research Fellowship Grant #2017/09612-0). The authors would like to thank Dr. Jeremy Squire for checking the English and for his critical review of this manuscript.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherUniversidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC)por
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectCentrifugationpor
dc.subjectDNA, Neoplasmpor
dc.subjectElectrophoresis, Agar Gelpor
dc.subjectHumanspor
dc.subjectMelaninspor
dc.subjectMelanomapor
dc.subjectPolymerase Chain Reactionpor
dc.subjectMelaninpor
dc.subjectPCR inhibitorpor
dc.subjectPigmented melanomaspor
dc.subjectPurificationpor
dc.subjectPolymerase inhibitionpor
dc.subjectPolymerase inhibitiopor
dc.titleComparison of protocols for removal of melanin from genomic DNA to optimize PCR amplification of DNA purified from highly pigmented lesionspor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.hh.um.es/Abstracts/Vol_34/34_9/34_9_1089.htmpor
oaire.citationStartPage1089por
oaire.citationEndPage1096por
oaire.citationIssue9por
oaire.citationVolume34por
dc.identifier.eissn1981-1322-
dc.identifier.doi10.14670/HH-18-112por
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.identifier.pmid30949991por
dc.subject.fosCiências Médicas::Ciências da Saúdepor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalHistology and Histopathologypor
Aparece nas coleções:ICVS - Artigos em revistas internacionais / Papers in international journals

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Melanin_Paper.pdf
Acesso restrito!
Accepted Manuscript1,4 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID