Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/66800

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorTozo Neto, Juliopor
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, Tiago Miguelpor
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-07T08:24:48Z-
dc.date.issued2020-
dc.identifier.issn1296-2074por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/66800-
dc.description.abstractAssessing and mitigating fire risk and vulnerability is of paramount importance, especially in historical centres, where the characteristics of the buildings and these areas themselves significantly contribute to the ignition and propagation of fire. Federal regulations require buildings to follow guidelines aimed at reducing fire risk, which may require undesirable changes to the architectural and historical characteristics of old constructions. In order to solve this conflict, some methodologies explicitly designed for the assessment of fire risk in ancient buildings, namely the ARICA and the FRI method, have been developed in recent years. A study recently conducted at the Historic Centre of Guimarães, in Portugal, in which the condition of 269 buildings was assessed, revealed that a high percentage of these buildings present a moderate to high fire risk. Based on this previous study, the present work discusses the improvement in the fire safety of the Historic Centre of Guimarães through the application of a series of risk mitigation strategies, which are analyzed resorting to a GIS tool. Analysis revealed that the application such intervention strategies, with an average cost of 28.48 euros per square metre, led to a reduction of the number of buildings considered to be of moderate to high fire risk from 67% to 1%, and to an increase of the percentage of buildings complying with regulations from 6% to 58%.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe work presented in this article was supported by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT) through the postdoctoral fellowship SFRH/BPD/122598/2016.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevier Massonpor
dc.relationSFRH/BPD/122598/2016por
dc.rightsrestrictedAccesspor
dc.subjectBuilt heritagepor
dc.subjectCost-benefit analysispor
dc.subjectFire riskpor
dc.subjectFire Risk Index methodpor
dc.titleAssessing and mitigating vulnerability and fire risk in historic centres: A cost-benefit analysispor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S129620742030162Xpor
oaire.citationStartPage279por
oaire.citationEndPage290por
oaire.citationVolume45por
dc.date.updated2020-09-07T07:33:40Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.culher.2020.04.003por
dc.date.embargo10000-01-01-
dc.subject.fosEngenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civilpor
dc.subject.wosSocial Sciencespor
dc.subject.wosArts & Humanitiespor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.export.identifier6175-
sdum.journalJournal of Cultural Heritagepor
Aparece nas coleções:ISISE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
1-s2.0-S129620742030162X-main-2.pdf
Acesso restrito!
6,12 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID