Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/58921

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorBranco, Jorge M.por
dc.contributor.authorVerbist, Maxime Paul Augustinpor
dc.contributor.authorDescamps, Thierrypor
dc.date.accessioned2019-02-04T16:14:00Z-
dc.date.available2019-02-04T16:14:00Z-
dc.date.issued2018-
dc.identifier.issn0141-0296por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/58921-
dc.description.abstractWhen assessing timber roof structures on-site for any restoration project, engineers can be faced with elements that, over time, were poorly preserved, especially damaged joints in contact with moist masonry walls. Before dealing with any intervention technique, the mechanical behaviour of such carpentry connections must be properly understood. Therefore, it has to be determined how the joints fail, which parameters (i.e. geometrical configurations and mechanical properties of the joint) influence the appearance conditions of failure modes, and the way how the internal forces are distributed within the connection. Therefore, the present paper aims at overviewing three different typologies of Step Joints (SJ) which can often be encountered within traditional timber carpentries between the rafter and the tie beam: the Single Step Joint, the Double Step Joint, and the Single Step Joint with Tenon-Mortise. Regarding each SJ typology, some design rules and geometrical recommendations can be gathered from European Standards and from authors of works on the subject, but no design equation is conventionally defined. Hence, new design models have been determined through the Analytical Campaign for the investigated Step Joints according to their geometrical parameters and to both failure modes: the shear crack in the tie beam and the crushing at the front-notch surface. In order to check the reliability of new design models and the emergence conditions of both failure modes, future experiments and numerical analysis on the three SJ typologies are going to be performed.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was partly financed in the framework of the Portuguese Public Procurement Code, LOTE 3ES2 – Escola Secundária de Loulé e Olhão. This work was financed by FEDER funds through the Competitively Factors Operational Programme – COMPETE and by national funds through FCT – Foundation for Science and Technology within the scope of the project PTDC/EPH-PAT/2401/2014 and PhD Scholarships SFRH/BD/128580/2017.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevier 1por
dc.relationPTDC/EPH-PAT/2401/2014-
dc.relationSFRH/BD/128580/2017-
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectTimber structurespor
dc.subjectTraditional jointspor
dc.subjectTimberpor
dc.subjectTraditional carpentry connectionspor
dc.subjectStep Jointspor
dc.subjectDesignpor
dc.subjectStandardspor
dc.titleDesign of three step joint typologies: review of european standardized approachespor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S014102961733729Xpor
oaire.citationStartPage573por
oaire.citationEndPage585por
oaire.citationVolume174por
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.073por
dc.subject.fosEngenharia e Tecnologia::Engenharia Civilpor
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalEngineering Structurespor
Aparece nas coleções:ISISE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
Designof3StepJointTypologies_ReviewofEuropeanstandardizedapproaches.pdf2,09 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID