Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/5567

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, R.-
dc.contributor.authorMelo, L. F.-
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-20T13:08:16Z-
dc.date.available2006-09-20T13:08:16Z-
dc.date.issued2006-09-
dc.identifier.citation"Biotechnology and bioengineering". ISSN 0006-3592. 95:1 (Sept. 2006) 169-175.eng
dc.identifier.issn0006-3592eng
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/5567-
dc.description.abstractIn this work the question was addressed if in nitrite-oxidizing activated sludge systems the environmental competition between Nitrobacter spp. and Nitrospira spp., which only recently has been discovered to play a role in these systems, is affected by the nitrite concentrations. Two parallel hemostats were inoculated with nitrifying-activated sludge containing Nitrospira and operated under identical conditions. After addition of Nitrobacter to both chemostats, the nitrite concentration in the influent of one of the chemostats was increased such that nitrite peaks in the bulk liquid of this reactor were detected. The other chemostat served as control reactor, which always had a constant nitrite influent concentration. The relative cellular area (RCA) of Nitrospira and Nitrobacter was determined by quantitative fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH). The nitrite perturbation stimulated the growth of Nitrobacter while in the undisturbed control chemostat Nitrospira dominated. Overall, the results of this experimental study support the hypothesis that Nitrobacter is a superior competitor when resources are abundant, while Nitrospira thrive under conditions of resource scarcity. Interestingly, the dominance of Nitrobacter over Nitrospira, caused by the elevated nitrite concentrations, could not be reverted by lowering the available nitrite concentration to the original level. One possible explanation for this result is that when Nitrobacter is present at a certain cell density it is able to inhibit the growth of Nitrospira. An alternative explanation would be that the length of the experimental period was not long enough to observe an increase of the Nitrospira population.eng
dc.description.sponsorshipPortuguese Ministry of Science andTechnology; University of Vienna.por
dc.language.isoengeng
dc.publisherJohn Wiley and Sonseng
dc.rightsopenAccesseng
dc.subjectNitrospiraeng
dc.subjectNitrobactereng
dc.subjectActivated sludgeeng
dc.subjectCompetitioneng
dc.subjectChemostateng
dc.subjectNitrobacter, activated sludgepor
dc.titleCompetition between nitrospira spp. and nitrobacter spp. in nitrite-oxidizing bioreactorseng
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyeseng
sdum.number1eng
sdum.pagination169-175eng
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedeng
sdum.volume95eng
oaire.citationStartPage169por
oaire.citationEndPage175por
oaire.citationIssue1por
oaire.citationVolume95por
dc.identifier.doi10.1002/bit.21004por
dc.identifier.pmid16703620por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalBiotechnology and Bioengineeringpor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
BB2006-Nogueira[1].pdf341,15 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID