Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo:
https://hdl.handle.net/1822/51824
Título: | Unexpected findings and documentaries |
Autor(es): | Moura, Vítor |
Palavras-chave: | Filosofia do cinema Documentário |
Data: | 2017 |
Editora: | Cambridge Scholars Publishing |
Resumo(s): | This paper proposes a comparison between recent attempts at a recalibration of the term “documentary” that have been consistently identified as the most relevant: Noël Carroll’s Gricean proposal, with its radical substitution of the term “documentary” by the more accurate notion of “presumptive assertion film” , Gregory Currie’s more essentialistic approach based upon the distinction between “testimony” and “trace” (adapted from Kendall Walton) added to the spectator’s awareness of the causal flow of meaning from the image / trace to the narrative, and Carl Plantinga’s non-definitional account that sees documentaries as proposing “asserted veridical representations”. This text proposes a panoramic view of all three accounts, a summary of their respective shortcomings and, briefly, a way to compile their insights into a workable explanation. |
Tipo: | Capítulo de livro |
URI: | https://hdl.handle.net/1822/51824 |
ISBN: | 978-144-38441-8-5 |
Acesso: | Acesso restrito UMinho |
Aparece nas coleções: |
Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro | Descrição | Tamanho | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unexpected findings and documentaries.pdf Acesso restrito! | 308,24 kB | Adobe PDF | Ver/Abrir |
Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons