Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/31452

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorGonçalves, F. A.por
dc.contributor.authorRuíz, Héctor A.por
dc.contributor.authorNogueira, C. C.por
dc.contributor.authorSantos, E. S. dospor
dc.contributor.authorTeixeira, J. A.por
dc.contributor.authorMacedo, G. R.por
dc.date.accessioned2014-12-01T14:59:03Z-
dc.date.available2014-12-01T14:59:03Z-
dc.date.issued2014-
dc.identifier.citationGonçalves, F. A.; Ruíz, H. A.; Nogueira, C. C.; Santos, E. S.; Teixeira, José A.; Macedo, G. R., Comparison of delignified coconuts waste and cactus for fuel-ethanol production by the simultaneous and semi-simultaneous saccharification and fermentation strategies. Fuel, 131, 66-76, 2014por
dc.identifier.issn0016-2361por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/31452-
dc.description.abstractIt is of the highest importance to study different alternatives/strategies as simultaneous (SSF) and semi-simultaneous (SSSF) saccharification and fermentation process, as well as the prospects of the utilization of lignocellulosic residues as raw materials for fuel-ethanol production. In the first part of this work, different raw materials (cactus (CAC), green coconut shell (GCS), mature coconut fibre (MCF) and mature coconut shell (MCS)) were pretreated by sequential alkaline hydrogen peroxide (Alk-H2O2)–sodium hydroxide (NaOH) process. The characterization of the obtained solids by FTIR, SEM, X-ray and crystallinity indexes confirmed the higher susceptibility of these pretreated materials to enzymatic action. These results were further confirmed by the corresponding glucose conversion yields – 68.44%, 70.20%, 76.21% and 74.50% for CAC, GCS, MCF and MCS, respectively. Subsequently, the comparison between SSF and SSSF using Saccharomyces cerevisiae, Pichia stipitis, Zymomonas mobilis and pretreated MCF (selected in the enzymatic hydrolysis step) was done, being shown that a short presaccharification step at 50 °C for 8 h in the SSSF had a positive effect on the overall ethanol yield, with an increase from 79.27–84.64% to 85.04–89.15%. In all the cases, the SSSF strategy allowed the obtention of higher ethanol concentrations than SSF.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors gratefully acknowledge the Brazilian research funding agencies CNPq and CAPES for financial support.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevier B.V.por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectBioethanolpor
dc.subjectPretreatmentpor
dc.subjectCoconut fibrepor
dc.subjectSSSFpor
dc.subjectEnzymatic hydrolysispor
dc.titleComparison of delignified coconuts waste and cactus for fuel-ethanol production by the simultaneous and semi-simultaneous saccharification and fermentation strategiespor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.commentsCEB17788por
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor
oaire.citationStartPage66por
oaire.citationEndPage76por
oaire.citationConferencePlaceNetherlands-
oaire.citationTitleBiofuelspor
oaire.citationVolume131por
dc.date.updated2014-11-28T17:53:47Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.fuel.2014.04.021por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalFuelpor
Aparece nas coleções:CEB - Publicações em Revistas/Séries Internacionais / Publications in International Journals/Series

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
document_17788_1.pdf2,21 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID