Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBotelho, Anabela-
dc.contributor.authorPinho, Micaela Moreira-
dc.contributor.authorVeiga, Paula Alexandra-
dc.description.abstractThis article provides highlights of the evolution of the health care rationing debate towards a more transparent and open approach involving public participation. Discretionary models that have dominated health sector decision-making are being questioned by different sectors of society. Using data from 442 college students, we explore public’s views on its involvement in health care rationing decisions. Findings suggest that although citizens wish to be consulted, they believe doctors should play the most important role on the rationing decisions. Nonetheless, the confidence in doctors is not independent of the criteria used to support their decisions.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis research was partially funded by Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT) through the Applied Microeconomics Research Unit (NIMA) award no. PEst-OE/EGE/UI3181/2011por
dc.publisherUniversidade do Minho. Núcleo de Investigação em Microeconomia Aplicada (NIMA)por
dc.subjectPriorities settingpor
dc.subjectPublic involvementpor
dc.subjectExplicit rationingpor
dc.titleWho and how should participate in health care priority setting? evidence from a Portuguese surveypor
oaire.citationTitleNIMA Working Paper Seriespor
Appears in Collections:NIMA - Documentos de Trabalho/Working Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
NIMAwp43.pdfNIMA WP43 Botelho_Pinho_Veiga172,12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID