Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/25894

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorSousa, Hélder S.-
dc.contributor.authorBranco, Jorge M.-
dc.contributor.authorLourenço, Paulo B.-
dc.date.accessioned2013-10-30T14:23:26Z-
dc.date.available2013-10-30T14:23:26Z-
dc.date.issued2013-
dc.identifier.isbn9783037858127por
dc.identifier.issn1662-8985por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/25894-
dc.description.abstractBesides the difficulty of assessing an existing timber structure on site, the efficiency and accuracy of visual inspection is often compromised by its subjective nature inherited by the level of expertise of the inspector. This often leads to conservative predictions of the mechanical properties, even with the use of specific visual grading norms. The main objectives of this work are to assess the effectiveness of visual inspection as to define different classes of strength and stiffness and to provide a statistical analysis on its subjectivity. For that aim, visual inspection using Italian standard UNI 11119:2004 and bending tests of 20 old chestnut beams (Castanea sativa Mill.) at different scales, were carried out. Comparisons and effectiveness of visual inspection is analyzed within and between different scales, and also regarding different level of expertise of inspectors. The results evidence similar percentages of segments classified with higher and lower visual grades and proved to be a good qualitative indicator of bending strength between sawn beams. For the most experienced inspectors, an overall 42% accuracy was found with a better differentiation between visual classes, whereas lower level inspectors scored approximately 5% less. Lower level inspectors evidenced higher concentration of values around a higher mean for each class denoting a more conservative approach. Regardless of the inspector level, knot size was the main limiting visual parameter with higher influence in small scales of the timber elements. When studying the characterization of a single knot, coefficients of variation of 15.7% and 21.8% were found for measuring the minimum and maximum diameter. Bayesian probability networks were considered as to individually assess the accuracy in stiffness prediction of different level of inspectors, and by combination of their information, evidencing that parallel combination for prior information may allow the increase in visual inspection accuracy.por
dc.description.sponsorshipFundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherTrans Tech Publicationspor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectChestnut timberpor
dc.subjectVisual inspectionpor
dc.subjectVisual strength classespor
dc.subjectVariation analysispor
dc.subjectSubjectivity evaluationpor
dc.titleEffectiveness and subjectivity of visual inspection as a method to assess bending stiffness and strength of chestnut elementspor
dc.typeconferencePaper-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor
oaire.citationStartPage175por
oaire.citationEndPage182por
oaire.citationTitleAdvanced Materials Researchpor
oaire.citationVolume778por
dc.identifier.doi10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.778.175-
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalAdvanced Materials Researchpor
sdum.conferencePublicationSTRUCTURAL HEALTH ASSESSMENT OF TIMBER STRUCTURESpor
Aparece nas coleções:ISISE - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2013 hss_jmb_pbl.pdfDocumento principal211,12 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID