Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

TitleComparing topic maps constraint specification languages
Author(s)Librelotto, Giovani Rubert
Azevedo, Renato Preigschadt de
Ramalho, José Carlos
Henriques, Pedro Rangel
KeywordsTopic maps
Semantic validation
Issue date2008
PublisherSpringer-Verlag Berlin
JournalLecture Notes in Computer Science
CitationINTERNATIONAL COMFERENCE ON TOPIC MAPS RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS (TMRA), 3, Leipzig, GERMANY, 2007 – “Scaling Topic Maps”. [Leipzig : s.n., 2008].
Abstract(s)Topic Map Constraint Language (TMCL) provides a means to express constraints on topic maps conforming to ISO/IEC 13250. In this article, we will use a test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of Topic Maps constraints in many different instances in order to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kinds of Topic Maps constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same topic maps instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do AsTMa!, OSL, Toma, and XTche relate to Topic Maps Constraint Language (TMCL)? What kind of constraints each one of these three can not specify? We will conclude this paper with a summary of the comparisons accomplished between those Topic Maps constraint languages over the use case proposed.
TypeConference paper
AccessOpen access
Appears in Collections:DI/CCTC - Artigos (papers)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
TMRA2007_ComparingTMCL-finalVersion.pdfArtigo em inglês281,57 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID