Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/66070

TítuloFluctuation in the assimilation of problematic experiences: a case study of dynamic systems analysis
Autor(es)Basto, Isabel
Stiles, William B
Bento, Tiago
Pinheiro, Patrícia
Mendes, Inês
Rijo, Daniel
Salgado, João
Palavras-chavedynamic systems theory
assimilation model
instability
psychotherapeutic change process
depression
fluctuation
dynamic factor model
Data2018
EditoraFrontiers Media
RevistaFrontiers in Psychology
CitaçãoBasto I, Stiles WB, Bento T, Pinheiro P, Mendes I, Rijo D and Salgado J (2018) Fluctuation in the Assimilation of Problematic Experiences: A Case Study of Dynamic Systems Analysis. Front. Psychol. 9:1119. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01119
Resumo(s)Dynamic systems theory suggests that instability can be a key element in the promotion of human change processes. Several studies have confirmed an association between unstable patterns and successful psychotherapeutic outcome. Somewhat similarly, the assimilation model of psychotherapeutic change argues that clinical change occurs through the integration of problematic experiences that initially threaten the stability of the self. This study examined how instability in assimilation levels was related to assimilation progress and change in symptom intensity, within and across sessions, in a good-outcome case of Emotion Focused Therapy. We used the assimilation of problematic experiences scales (APES) to measure assimilation and the outcome-questionnaire (OQ-10) to measure clinical symptom intensity. To assess assimilation instability, we used a fluctuation measure that calculated the amplitude and the frequency of changes in assimilation levels. To analyze the structural relationships between variables we used a dynamic factor model. The results showed that APES level and APES fluctuation tended to increase across treatment, while OQ-10 scores tended to decrease. However, contrary to expectations, the dynamic factor model showed no significant associations between APES fluctuation and OQ-10 scores either within sessions or between adjacent sessions.
TipoArtigo
URIhttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/66070
DOI10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01119
ISSN1664-1078
Versão da editorahttps://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01119/full
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoAcesso aberto
Aparece nas coleções:CIPsi - Artigos (Papers)

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
fpsyg-09-01119.pdf760,28 kBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Este trabalho está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons Creative Commons

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID