Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/619

TitleConstraint specification languages: comparing XCSL, Schematron and XML-Schemas
Author(s)Jacinto, Marta Henriques
Librelotto, Giovani Rubert
Ramalho, José Carlos
Henriques, Pedro Rangel
Issue date2002
CitationJACINTO, Marta Henriques [et al.] - Constraint specification languages : comparing XCSL, Schematron and XML-Schemas. In XML EUROPE, Barcelona, 2002 : proceedings [Em linha] [S.l.] : IDEAlliance, [c.2002], actual. 2004. [consult. 23 Set. 2004]. Disponível na Internet: http://www.idealliance.org/papers/xmle02/
Abstract(s)After being able to mark-up text and validate its structure according to a grammar, we may start thinking it would be natural to be able to validate some non-structural issues in XML documents like relationships between elements belonging to different contexts, invariants over data models, constraints over attribute values and relationships between attributes. XML Schemas are a big step in that direction. However, they only allow users to specify primitive constraints like data typing and data format. Currently, we can find two approaches that represent a complement to DTDs or XML Schemas - XCSL and Schematron - and allow us to specify constraints and to validate the instances of a family of documents against that set of rules. Both are implemented on top of XSL. Both use a kind of an XML envelope to hide XSL specification. XSLT pattern language is the core language of both systems. With all these resemblances it is easy to conclude that they are quite similar. However they differ in some fundamental concepts. These two constraint specification languages together with XML Schemas were hardly tested and benchmarked with an huge test suite. The most significant results will be discussed in this paper. We will try to answer questions like: Do they do the same job? Are there some kind of constraints that are easier to specify with one of them? Do you need different background to use the tools? Is it possible to use them in similar situations (the same DTD, the same XML instances)? May we use them to produce an equal result? How do XCSL and Schematron relate to XML Schemas? What is the intersection area of these three? What kind of constraints each one of these three is able to specify? What kind of constraints each one of these three can not specify? In this article, we will use that test suite and show, step-by-step, the way we handled several kinds of constraints in many different instances.
TypeConference paper
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/619
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessOpen access
Appears in Collections:DI/CCTC - Artigos (papers)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
JLRH02-XMLEurope.pdfArticle121,32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
JLRH02-XMLEurope-slides.pdfSlides192,91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID