Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: https://hdl.handle.net/1822/57179

Registo completo
Campo DCValorIdioma
dc.contributor.authorFerreira, A.por
dc.contributor.authorPinheiro, M. D.por
dc.contributor.authorBrito, J.por
dc.contributor.authorMateus, Ricardopor
dc.date.accessioned2018-12-07T12:41:58Z-
dc.date.available2018-12-07T12:41:58Z-
dc.date.issued2018-10-
dc.date.submitted2018-10-
dc.identifier.citationFerreira A., Pinheiro M. D., Brito J., Mateus R. Combined carbon and energy intensity benchmarks for sustainable retail stores, Energy, Vol. 165, Part B, pp. 877-889, doi:10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.020, 2018por
dc.identifier.issn0360-5442por
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1822/57179-
dc.description.abstractRetail stores are amongst the building typologies with the highest carbon (CI) and energy intensities (EI). However, previous studies have only explored the EI of food and non-food retailers. This study is the first of its kind to examine the link between CI and EI. Establishing the nature of this link will allow a deeper understanding of how to decarbonize the retail sector. Here, we hypothesised whether in retail low EI correlated with low CI and how corporate revenue affected these variables. ?Best practice? and ?conventional practice? benchmarks were then developed to assess retail buildings' sustainability. These represent missing and highly desirable tools in retail sustainable management. Average EI and CI of food retailers were twice that of non-food retailers (EI-548 vs 238?kWh/m2/y; CI266 vs 132?kg CO?eq/m2/y). The correlation found between EI and CI indicates that low energy consumption leads to low greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. CI variability resulted mostly of energy-efficiency strategies, of the energy production process and of GHG emissions from refrigeration systems. EI variability resulted mostly from store typology, volume and usage. The proposed benchmarks help to set energy and carbon reference performance levels in retail buildings and to stimulate best sustainable practice amongst retailers.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThis work was supported by FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia [grant number PD/BD/127852/2016] under the Doctoral Program EcoCoRe - Eco-Construction and Rehabilitation. Support from CERIS and Instituto Superior Técnico is also acknowledged.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherElsevierpor
dc.relationPD/BD/127852/2016por
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectEnergy consumptionpor
dc.subjectEnergy-efficiencypor
dc.subjectFood and non-food retailerspor
dc.subjectSustainability Benchmarkspor
dc.subjectBenchmarkspor
dc.subjectSustainabilitypor
dc.titleCombined carbon and energy intensity benchmarks for sustainable retail storespor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360544218320085por
dc.commentshttp://ctac.uminho.pt/node/2898por
oaire.citationStartPage877por
oaire.citationEndPage889por
oaire.citationTitleEnergy-
oaire.citationVolume165, Part Bpor
dc.date.updated2018-12-07T11:52:08Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.energy.2018.10.020por
dc.description.publicationversioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionpor
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalEnergypor
Aparece nas coleções:C-TAC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
2898-AFerreira_MDPinheiro_JBrito_RMateus_Energy.pdf2,41 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID