Utilize este identificador para referenciar este registo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/52829

TítuloKidney segmentation in ultrasound, magnetic resonance and computed tomography images: a systematic review
Autor(es)Torres, Helena Daniela Ribeiro
Queirós, Sandro Filipe Monteiro
Morais, Pedro André Gonçalves
Oliveira, Bruno
Fonseca, Jaime C.
Vilaça, João L.
Palavras-chaveComputed tomography
Kidney segmentation
Magnetic resonance imaging
Systematic review
Ultrasound imaging
DataAbr-2018
EditoraElsevier
RevistaComputer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Resumo(s)Background and objective: Segmentation is an essential step in computer-aided diagnosis and treatment planning of kidney diseases. In recent years, several researchers proposed multiple techniques to segment the kidney in medical images from distinct imaging acquisition systems, namely ultrasound, magnetic resonance, and computed tomography. This article aims to present a systematic review of the different methodologies developed for kidney segmentation. Methods: With this work, it is intended to analyze and categorize the different kidney segmentation algorithms, establishing a comparison between them and discussing the most appropriate methods for each modality. For that, articles published between 2010 and 2016 were analyzed. The search was performed in Scopus and Web of Science using the expressions “kidney segmentation” and “renal segmentation”. Results: A total of 1528 articles were retrieved from the databases, and 95 articles were selected for this review. After analysis of the selected articles, the reviewed segmentation techniques were categorized according to their theoretical approach. Conclusions: Based on the performed analysis, it was possible to identify segmentation approaches based on distinct image processing classes that can be used to accurately segment the kidney in images of different imaging modalities. Nevertheless, further research on kidney segmentation must be conducted to overcome the current drawbacks of the state-of-the-art methods. Moreover, a standardization of the evaluation database and metrics is needed to allow a direct comparison between methods.
Tipoarticle
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/52829
DOI10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.01.014
ISSN0169-2607
e-ISSN1872-7565
Versão da editorawww.elsevier.com/locate/cmpb
Arbitragem científicayes
AcessoclosedAccess
Aparece nas coleções:DEI - Artigos em revistas internacionais

Ficheiros deste registo:
Ficheiro Descrição TamanhoFormato 
HTorres_CMPB_2018.pdf3,28 MBAdobe PDFVer/Abrir  Solicitar cópia ao autor!

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu Currículo DeGóis