Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:

TitleVariable use of strong preterites: a sociolinguistic and theoretical approach
Author(s)Barbosa, Pilar
Bastos-Gee, Ana C.
Flores, Cristina
KeywordsVerb morphology
Distributed morphology
Strong preterites
Paradigm levelling
Issue dateNov-2017
PublisherJohn Benjamins Publishing
CitationBarbosa, Pilar, Bastos-Gee, Ana & Flores, Cristina (2017). Variable use of strong preterites. A sociolinguistic and theoretical approach. In P. Barbosa, C. Paiva & C. Rodrigues (eds.), Studies on Variation in Portuguese (pp. 154–175). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins. DOI: 10.1075/ihll.14.06bar
Abstract(s)This paper examines a particular case of variable syncretism in the Minho region in Portugal, involving the 1st person singular (1sg) and 3rd person singular (3sg) forms of “strong” preterits of the verbs estar ‘be-stative’, ter ‘have’, fazer ‘do’ and ser /ir ‘be’/‘go’. These forms can be levelled, affecting the 1st or the 3rd person. Fifty interviews from a socially stratified corpus of the relevant dialect were examined by running a mixed effect binominal analysis, which identified as main predictors the factors subject expression, verb and level of education. Moreover, there is a difference between estar/ter/fazer ‘be-stative/have/do’ and ser/ir ‘be/go’. In the latter case, only one form is used (the 3rd person form foi), while in the case of estar/ter/fazer ‘be-stative/have/do’ levelling can be realized by either the form for 1sg or 3sg. This inter-linguistic variation is analysed following the “late insertion” model of Distributed Morphology (Halle & Marantz, 1993). We develop an account of these agreement levelling effects that is based on the interaction between the internal syntax of strong preterites and the late insertion of underspecified functional Vocabulary Items. We propose a derivation of the different forms in the standard dialect and then we offer an analysis of levelling where intra-speaker variation is tied to the probabilistic application of feature deleting Impoverishment operations along the lines of Nevins and Parrott (2010). Inter-speaker variation is due to different choices as to which feature sets are subject to Impoverishment: the features for Person or T. For estar/ ter/fazer ‘be-stative/have/do’ these two operations yield different outputs (in the case of ter, /teve/ and /tive/, respectively). For ser/ir ‘be/go’ the resulting forms are homophonous, namely /foj/ in both cases.
TypeBook part
Publisher version
AccessOpen access
Appears in Collections:CEHUM - Livros e Capítulos de Livros

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Variable use of strong preterites.pdf577,12 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID