Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/4282

TitleAlgumas considerações sobre as principais declarações que suportam o movimento Acesso Livre
Other titlesSome thoughts over the main declarations that support the open access movement
Author(s)Sarmento e Souza, M. F.
Miranda, Ângelo
Baptista, Ana Alice
Ramos, Isabel
KeywordsOpen access
Copyright
Institutional repository
Scientific communication
Budapest open access Initiative
Berlin declaration on Open access to knowledge in the sciences and humanities
Bethesda statement on Open Access Publishing
Issue date21-Sep-2005
CitationIn WORLD CONGRESS ON HEALTH INFORMATION AND LIBRARIES, 9, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 2005 – “World Congress on Health Information and Libraries” [Em linha]. [Consult. 31 Jan. 2006]. Disponível em: http://www.icml9.org/program/track5/public/documents/Fernanda%20Sarmento-112444.pdf
Abstract(s)Internet technologies have a great impact on the publishing industry. Hopefully digital contents in science and technology should have their quality assured by a review process made by peers in order do make them more reliable for the reader (consumer) than other digital contents. The Open Access (OA) movement promotes free delivery of the scholarly literature, by-passing copyright constraints and licenses/authorizations. Two roads widely accepted for OA are the “golden” road and the “green” road. In the first one, journals are OA themselves; in the last one, after publication on a non-OA journal, authors are allowed to store their articles on an institutional or in a thematic repository (OA archives). Institutional repositories are seen as a new strategy for universities to promote changes in the scholarly communication process. They capture, preserve and give access to digital collections of the intellectual production of one or several universities. The open and wide access may be a way to solve such problems as the high cost of journals’ subscriptions and the acquisition and dissemination of gray literature. Since institutional repositories are considered one of the main channels for scholarly literature dissemination, it is important and necessary that authors (producers) and decision-makers carefully analyze the contents of the Budapest Open Access Initiative, Bethesda Statement on Open Access Publishing, and Berlin Declaration on Open Access to Knowledge in the Sciences and Humanities (BBB declarations), which are the more central and influent definitions for the OA movement. A better understanding of concepts, terminology and definitions of these declarations’ contents is proposed. Copyright, derivative works and quality assurance approaches are compared and discussed.
TypePanel presentation
DescriptionComunicação apresentada no 9º World Congress on Health Information and Libraries, Salvador, Bahia, Brazil, 20-23 Set. 2005.
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/4282
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessOpen access
Appears in Collections:DSI - Sociedade da Informação

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Sarmento Miranda Baptista Ramos - Versão Final.pdf102,88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID