Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/40696

TitleThree-dimensional technology facilitates surgical performance of novice laparoscopy surgeons: a quantitative assessment on a porcine kidney model
Author(s)Cicione, Antonio
Autorino, Riccardo
Laguna, M. Pilar
Sio, Marco De
Dias, Emanuel Carvalho
Micali, Salvatore
Turna, Burak
Sanchez-Salas, Rafael
Quattrone, Carmelo
Dias, Emanuel
Mota, Paulo
Bianchi, Giampoalo
Damano, Rocco
Rassweiler, Jens
Lima, Estêvão Augusto Rodrigues de
Issue date2015
PublisherElsevier
JournalUrology
CitationCicione, A., Autorino, R., Laguna, M. P., De Sio, M., Micali, S., Turna, B., . . . Lima, E. (2015). Three-dimensional Technology Facilitates Surgical Performance of Novice Laparoscopy Surgeons: A Quantitative Assessment on a Porcine Kidney Model. Urology, 85(6), 1252-1256. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.009
Abstract(s)Objective To determine whether the use of 3-dimensional (3D) imaging translates into a better surgical performance of naïve urologic laparoscopic surgeons during pyeloplasty (PY) and partial nephrectomy (PN) procedures. Materials and Methods Eighteen surgeons without any previous laparoscopic experience were randomly assigned to perform PY and PN in a porcine model using initially 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D laparoscopy. A surgical performance score was rated by an "expert" tutor through a modified 5-item global rating scale contemplating operative field view, bimanual dexterity, efficiency, tissue handling, and autonomy. Overall surgical time, complications, subjective perception of participating surgeons, and inconveniences related to the 3D vision were recorded. Results No difference in terms if operative time was found between 2D or 3D laparoscopy for both the PY (P =.51) and the PN (P =.28) procedures. A better rate in terms of surgical performance score was noted by the tutors when the study participants were using 3D vs 2D, for both PY (3.6 [0.8] vs 3.0 [0.4]; P =.034) and PN (3.6 [0.51] vs 3.15 [0.63]; P =.001). No complications occurred in any of the procedures. Most (77.2%) of the participating na??ve laparoscopic surgeons had the perception that 3D laparoscopy was overall easier than 2D. Headache (18.1%), nausea (18.1%), and visual disturbance (18.1%) were the most common issues reported by the surgeons during 3D procedures. Conclusion Despite the absence of translation in a shorter operative time, the use of 3D technology seems to facilitate the surgical performance of naive surgeons during laparoscopic kidney procedures on a porcine model.
Typearticle
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/40696
DOI10.1016/j.urology.2015.03.009
ISSN0090-4295
Publisher versionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429515002514
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessopenAccess
Appears in Collections:ICVS - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais com Referee

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-s0090429515002514-main.pdf411,1 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu Currículo DeGóis