Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/33891

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCastro, Maria de Fátima Morais de Aguiar epor
dc.contributor.authorMateus, Ricardopor
dc.contributor.authorBragança, L.por
dc.date.accessioned2015-02-16T10:42:35Z-
dc.date.available2015-02-16T10:42:35Z-
dc.date.issued2015-
dc.date.submitted2015-01-
dc.identifier.citationCastro, M. F., Mateus, R., & Bragança, L. (2015). A critical analysis of building sustainability assessment methods for healthcare buildings. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 17(6), 1381-1412. doi: 10.1007/s10668-014-9611-0-
dc.identifier.issn1387-585Xpor
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/33891-
dc.description.abstractThe healthcare building project contains different aspects from the most common projects. Designing a healthcare environment is based on a number of criteria related to the satisfaction and well-being of the professional working teams, patients and administrators. Mostly due to various design requirements, these buildings are rarely designed and operated in a sustainable way. Therefore, the sustainable development is a concept whose importance has grown significantly in the last decade in this sector. The worldwide economic crisis reinforces the growing environmental concerns as well as raising awareness among people to a necessary and inevitable shift in the values of their society. To support sustainable building design, several building sustainability assessment (BSA) methods are being developed worldwide. Since healthcare buildings are rather complex systems than other buildings, so specific methods were developed for them. These methods are aimed to support decision-making towards the introduction of the best sustainability practices during the design and operation phases of a healthcare environment. However, the comparison between the results of different methods is difficult, if not impossible, since they address different environmental, societal and economic criteria, and they emphasize different phases of the life cycle. Therefore, the aim of this study was to clarify the differences between the main BSA methods for healthcare buildings by analysing and categorizing them. Furthermore, the benefits of these methods in promoting a more sustainable environment will be analysed, and the current situation of them within the context of standardization of the concept sustainable construction will be discussed.por
dc.description.sponsorshipThe authors acknowledge the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology and POPH/FSE for the financial support for this study under the Reference SFRH/BD/77959/2011.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherSpringerpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectAssessment methodspor
dc.subjectHealthcare buildingspor
dc.subjectLife cyclepor
dc.subjectSustainabilitypor
dc.titleA critical analysis of building sustainability assessment methods for healthcare buildingspor
dc.typearticle-
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10668-014-9611-0por
dc.commentshttp://ctac.uminho.pt/node/2031por
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor
oaire.citationStartPage1por
oaire.citationEndPage32por
oaire.citationIssue6por
oaire.citationTitleEnvironment, Development and Sustainabilitypor
oaire.citationVolume17por
dc.date.updated2015-02-13T17:53:55Z-
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/s10668-014-9611-0-
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalEnvironment, Development and Sustainabilitypor
Appears in Collections:C-TAC - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2031-ENVI_FCastro_RMateus_LBraganca.pdf572,41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID