Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/33869

TitleNegative pressure therapy vs. moist wound healing in chronic wounds: A systematic review
Author(s)Pereira, Rui Pedro Gomes
Cainé, João
Rito, Maria
KeywordsNegative pressure therapy
Crhonic wounds
Moist wound healing
Issue date2013
Abstract(s)Background: Wound healing is a complex process which results in the demand for repair and restoration of the functionality of the tissues. The failure of this process presents as a challenge raising the need to search for new techniques to treat the wound. Methods: We conducted a systematic review through several databases and repositories, using the MeSH terms: "negative pressure/NPWT/vacuum assisted closure/VAC/VAC therapy/wound healing/chronic wounds/moist wound healing”. The selection criteria were based on relevance, methodology and current level of evidence. Results: The study provides a quantitative comparison of negative pressure wound therapy and moist wound healing in chronic wounds, using data about the healing time and variations in the dimension of wounds. Discussion: Data analysis indicates the negative pressure therapy as the most effective in reducing the size of the wound, thus allowing shorter total healing as compared with moist wound healing. Conclusion: There is evidence supporting negative pressure wound therapy’s efficacy but it is important to carry out further experimental studies for evaluating the effectiveness of its wider implementation.
TypeAbstract
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/33869
Publisher versionhttp://www.index-f.com/para/n19/171d.php
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessRestricted access (UMinho)
Appears in Collections:ESE-CIE - Comunicações / Communications

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Resumo_TPN.pdf
  Restricted access
Artigo_TPN194,8 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy!

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID