Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/33668

TitleThree-dimensional vs standard laparoscopy: comparative assessment using a validated program for laparoscopic urologic skills
Author(s)Cicione, António
Autorino, Riccardo
Breda, Alberto
De Sio, Marco
Damiano, Rocco
Fusco, Ferdinando
Greco, Francesco
Dias, Emanuel Carvalho
Mota, Paulo
Nogueira, Cristina
Pinho, Pedro
Mirone, Vincenzo
Pinto, Jorge Correia
Rassweiler, Jens
Lima, Estêvão Augusto Rodrigues de
Issue date2013
PublisherElsevier
JournalUrology
Abstract(s)OBJECTIVE To compare the last generation of 3-dimensional imaging (3D) vs standard 2-dimensional imaging (2D) laparoscopy. MATERIALS AND METHODS A prospective observational study was conducted during the 4th Minimally Invasive Urological Surgical Week Course held in Braga (Portugal) in April 2013. The course participants and faculty were asked to perform standardized tasks in the dry laboratory setting and randomly assigned into 2 study groups; one starting with 3D, the other with 2D laparoscopy. The 5 tasks of the European Training in Basic Laparoscopic Urological Skills were performed. Time to complete each task and errors made were recorded and analyzed. An end-of-study questionnaire was filled by the participants. RESULTS Ten laparoscopic experts and 23 laparoscopy-naive residents were included. Overall, a significantly better performance was obtained using 3D in terms of time (1115 seconds, interquartile range [IQR] 596-1469 vs 1299 seconds, IQR 620-1723; P = .027) and number of errors (2, IQR 1-3 vs 3, IQR 2-5.5; P = .001). However, the experts were faster only in the "peg transfer" task when using the 3D, whereas naives improved their performance in 3 of the 5 tasks. A linear correlation between level of experience and performance was found. Three-dimensional imaging was perceived as "easier" by a third of the laparoscopy-naive participants (P = .027). CONCLUSION Three-dimensional imaging seems to facilitate surgical performance of urologic surgeons without laparoscopic background in the dry laboratory setting. The advantage provided by 3D for those with previous laparoscopic experience remains to be demonstrated. Further studies are needed to determine the actual advantage of 3D over standard 2D laparoscopy in the clinical setting.
Typearticle
URIhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/33668
DOI10.1016/j.urology.2013.07.047
ISSN0090-4295
Publisher versionhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0090429513010376
Peer-Reviewedyes
AccessrestrictedAccess
Appears in Collections:ICVS - Artigos em Revistas Internacionais com Referee

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
cicione a_ urology 2013.pdf208,88 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy!

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu Currículo DeGóis