Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/13775

Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorGiraldez, Maria J.-
dc.contributor.authorGarcía-Resúa, Carlos-
dc.contributor.authorLira, Madalena-
dc.contributor.authorOliveira, M. Elisabete-
dc.contributor.authorYebra-Pimentel Vilar, Eva-
dc.date.accessioned2011-10-04T17:27:32Z-
dc.date.available2011-10-04T17:27:32Z-
dc.date.issued2010-05-01-
dc.date.submitted2009-
dc.identifier.issn0275-5408por
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/13775-
dc.descriptionUncorrected proofpor
dc.description.abstractPurpose: The aim of this study was to characterize, qualitatively and quantitatively, the surface morphology of four unworn conventional hydrogel contact lenses (Omafilcon, Hioxifilcon-based, Nefilcon A and Ocufilcon B) by White Light Optical Profiling (WLOP). WLOP is an ideal technique for sampling larger areas as well as for higher measurement speed compared with other topography techniques used in contact lens studies. Methods: Surface roughness was assessed by WLOP in the Vertical Scanning Mode, with a Wyko NT1100, which is a non-contact optical profiling system that provides high vertical resolution. Representative roughness parameters, the Average Roughness (Ra), Root-mean-square Roughness (Rms), and Maximum Roughness (Rmax), for areas of 625, 2500, 10829 and 67 646 lm2 were calculated. Results: Higher Ra, Rms and Rmax values were obtained for larger areas in all lenses. Daily disposable contact lenses (Nefilcon A and Ocufilcon B) presented the highest Ra, Rms and Rmax values, the larger changes in these parameters becoming apparent with the increase in the measured area. Differences between lenses were less obvious when data from 625 and 2500 lm2 area were compared. Conclusions: Daily disposable contact lenses showed the highest roughness surface. Analyzing larger areas might be adequate to detect differences between lenses in terms of surface characteristics, which may not be so obvious if smaller areas are studied.por
dc.language.isoengpor
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellpor
dc.rightsopenAccesspor
dc.subjectContact lensespor
dc.subjectHydrogelspor
dc.subjectSurface characterizationpor
dc.subjectSurface roughnesspor
dc.subjectTopographypor
dc.subjectWhite light optical profilingpor
dc.titleWhite light interferometry to characterize the hydrogel contact lens surfacepor
dc.typearticlepor
dc.peerreviewedyespor
dc.relation.publisherversionhttp://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/bsc/opo/2010/00000030/00000003/art00009?token=00461252d45c5f3b3b47462148743b3e70557b2f2a6c4f582a2f4876753375686f4961por
sdum.publicationstatuspublishedpor
degois.publication.firstPage289por
degois.publication.lastPage297por
degois.publication.issue3por
degois.publication.titleOphthalmic and Physiological Opticspor
degois.publication.volume30por
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1475-1313.2010.00712.xpor
dc.identifier.pmid20444136por
dc.subject.wosScience & Technologypor
sdum.journalOphthalmic and Physiological Opticspor
Appears in Collections:CDF - FAMO - Artigos/Papers (with refereeing)

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Geraldez M. et al (OPO) 2010-1.pdfarticle600,61 kBAdobe PDFView/Open

Partilhe no FacebookPartilhe no TwitterPartilhe no DeliciousPartilhe no LinkedInPartilhe no DiggAdicionar ao Google BookmarksPartilhe no MySpacePartilhe no Orkut
Exporte no formato BibTex mendeley Exporte no formato Endnote Adicione ao seu ORCID